I Bell's theorem claimed to be refuted - paper published by EPL

Click For Summary
A recent paper published in EPL claims to refute Bell's theorem by presenting a contextual model that accurately predicts measurement results for entangled particles. The authors argue that Bell's original reasoning overlooked contextual models, which could explain quantum correlations without invoking superluminal non-local interactions. Critics contend that Bell's theorem remains valid, as it has been supported by numerous experiments and further developments in quantum theory. The discussion highlights the ongoing debate about the implications of contextuality and locality in quantum mechanics. Overall, the paper's assertions challenge established interpretations of quantum phenomena.
  • #51
The claim made in the title of this thread has been admitted by the OP to be false. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

I Model used to refute Bell's theorem
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Is Bell's Theorem Inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics?
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
I Local Causality and Bell's Second Theorem
Replies
48
Views
6K
Simultaneously testing the Kochen-Specker and Bell theorems
Replies
4
Views
3K
I How do you understand EPR & Bell's Theorem?
Replies
47
Views
5K
A Hidden Assumptions in Bell's Theorem?
7
Replies
333
Views
18K
A I have some naive questions about the Reeh-Schlieder theorem
Replies
1
Views
401
I A computational model of Bell correlations
2
Replies
76
Views
7K
B Some questions about "superdeterminism" and Bell's Theorem
2
Replies
75
Views
11K
Questioning assumptions behind Bell's and related theorems
2
Replies
82
Views
10K