Do you cry more for the loss of a pet or a loved one?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Crying frequency varies among individuals, with some expressing emotions through tears multiple times a week, while others cry infrequently. Emotional responses to loss differ, with many finding they cry more for pets than for family members, often due to the deep bond shared with animals. Crying is viewed as a natural part of the grieving process and can serve as a therapeutic release, helping to alleviate pent-up emotions. Some participants argue that crying can be overrated or seen as a way to seek sympathy, suggesting that addressing problems directly is more effective. However, others emphasize the importance of emotional expression, noting that crying can be a healthy way to process grief and stress. The discussion also touches on the concept of "happy tears," with some expressing confusion over the phenomenon, while others share personal experiences of joy that elicited tears. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity of emotional expression and the varied ways individuals cope with grief and happiness.
  • #31
I too believe that tears and grief are signals for sympathy. Of course they may feel good and are probably healthy, but why doesn't the brain just have some invisible mechanism to dispel grief and suffering after a while? Crying is a physical, outward act--the only reason for having a physical act instead of an invisible internal mechanism is as a signal that you may need help.

By the way, this reminds me of the Smiley Fairy
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=smiley+fairy&btnG=Google+Search
 
Last edited: