Do you guys think this will work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brandontran87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a locking mechanism utilizing a powerful magnet, specifically an electromagnet and a permanent magnet. Participants explore different approaches to achieve the desired locking function, including the use of solenoids and considerations for safety features in the design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using an electromagnet to push a permanent magnet out as part of a locking mechanism.
  • Another participant suggests that a traditional solenoid might be a more effective solution, explaining that it attracts a ferrous bolt when current flows through it.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for the coil field to demagnetize the permanent magnet over time, with a suggestion that using two opposing electromagnets could mitigate this issue.
  • A participant inquires whether it would be better to purchase a solenoid or build one themselves, later discovering the concept of latching solenoids.
  • Questions are posed about the mechanism of demagnetization of permanent magnets by opposing magnetic fields.
  • Considerations are introduced regarding the design's fail-safe versus fail-secure nature, specifically whether the door should unlock or remain locked if power is lost.
  • Examples of commercial magnetic locks are discussed, highlighting their operation during power loss and their use in emergency situations.
  • Further discussion includes the design of elevators and fire doors that utilize magnetic mechanisms for safety during emergencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to designing the locking mechanism, with some advocating for solenoids and others discussing the implications of using permanent magnets. The discussion includes multiple competing views and remains unresolved regarding the optimal design choice.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the potential for demagnetization of permanent magnets and the implications of power loss on the locking mechanism, but do not resolve these technical concerns or provide definitive solutions.

brandontran87
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am making a locking mechanism with a very powerful magnet. The electromagnet in the diagram is held in place. Basically when the electromagnet turns on it will push the permanent magnet out. Here is a picture of what I want to do.
http://www.mypicx.com/05202009/fas/
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
brandontran87 said:
I am making a locking mechanism with a very powerful magnet. The electromagnet in the diagram is held in place. Basically when the electromagnet turns on it will push the permanent magnet out. Here is a picture of what I want to do.
http://www.mypicx.com/05202009/fas/

Welcome to the PF. The traditional way to do that function is with a solenoid, which attracts a ferrous bolt into a soltnoid with the current flows through the solenoid (Quiz Question -- why does it attract the bolt?).

The problem with using a permanent magnet to be repelled by the coil field, is that the coil field will tend to demagnetize the permanent magnet over time. If you could use two opposing electromagnets, you would not have that problem. But the traditional solenoid arrangement is usually the most cost-effective arrangement for generating linear forces with a current input.
 
I see. So what you're saying is that I should build a solenoid of some sort and maybe place an iron bolt inside that is spring loaded? That is very interesting. Do they sell these things or do you think it's better for me to make it myself?

edit: lol nvm, you don't have to answer that. Just found out what latching solenoids are. heh thanks man!

Another question. Why will the coil field demagnetize the permanent magnet?
 
Last edited:
brandontran87 said:
Another question. Why will the coil field demagnetize the permanent magnet?

Just as a magnetic field in one direction is used to magnetize the magnet, a magnetic field in the opposite direction will serve to demagnetize it (or even magnetize it in the opposite direction, if the field is stong enough).

A permanent magnet is just a magnetic material with magnetization at one end of its hysteresis loop:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_hysteresis#Magnetic_hysteresis

.
 
One thing to consider while designing this thing is whether you want it 'fail safe' or 'fail secure'. Ie: if the electromagnet loses power, do you want the door unlocked or locked?
 
Ie, many commercial buildings use purely magnetic locks (a magnet literally holds the door closed). They release when power is lost, which can be advantageous for an emergency.
 
russ_watters said:
Ie, many commercial buildings use purely magnetic locks (a magnet literally holds the door closed). They release when power is lost, which can be advantageous for an emergency.

Those are internal doors, obviously. Our elevators are also designed to drop to Floor 1 and open their doors in emergencies. We test those things pretty regularly.
 
berkeman said:
Those are internal doors, obviously. Our elevators are also designed to drop to Floor 1 and open their doors in emergencies. We test those things pretty regularly.
Yes. And ironically, the opposite also exists (didn't think of it when I wrote that last post). Fire doors can be propped open normally if they are held open by a magnet, closing (but not locking) in the event of a fire to stop it from spreading.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K