Do you people here watch The MythBusters on Discovery Channel?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the television show "MythBusters," highlighting various experiments conducted by the hosts, including myths about toilet flushing direction in different hemispheres and the ignition of gasoline by a lit cigarette. Users express mixed opinions on the show's scientific validity, with some criticizing the methodology, such as testing the efficiency of driving with windows down versus using air conditioning at insufficient speeds. The consensus acknowledges the entertainment value of the show while questioning the accuracy of certain myth-busting claims.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic scientific principles and experimental design
  • Familiarity with the concept of myth-busting in popular media
  • Knowledge of thermodynamics related to heat transfer and combustion
  • Awareness of the impact of variables in scientific testing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the scientific method and its application in experimental design
  • Explore thermodynamics principles, particularly regarding heat transfer
  • Investigate the effects of aerodynamics on vehicle efficiency at varying speeds
  • Examine case studies of myth-busting experiments and their scientific critiques
USEFUL FOR

Viewers of "MythBusters," science enthusiasts, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of entertainment and scientific inquiry.

billthegeek
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Do you people here watch The MythBusters on Discovery Channel? I think those people on the show are super weird but cool. They have also conducted several ground-breaking experiments like "Is it possible to break wind so much that you can suffocate to death? " and "Are teeth strong enough to withstand the force of a bullet?".

So, have any of you tried any mythbusting urself? Is it true that you get electrocuted if lightning strikes water tanks on top of your apartments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
- toilet flushing in different direction in N or S hemisphere
- warm water freezing to ice cubes faster than cold water
- lit cigarette igniting gasoline

OK, I've never actually done these experiments, but I've always planned to.
 
They did a cool one on verifying that people can get killed in a car crash by stuff that they'd left on the bit covering the boot (I believe you Americans call this a trunk) launghing into the back of the person's head...
 
DaveC426913 said:
- toilet flushing in different direction in N or S hemisphere
- warm water freezing to ice cubes faster than cold water
- lit cigarette igniting gasoline

OK, I've never actually done these experiments, but I've always planned to.

I never tried the toilet bowl one before but i know the cigarette lighting gasoline myth is busted.
The lit cigarette does not contain enough heat or an active flame needed to ignite the accelerant.

http://mesh.medill.northwestern.edu/mnschicago/archives/2004/11/fire_expert_cha.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is a good show, but I do not always agree that they have busted the myths. For instance, Is it more effecient to drive with the windows down or use the AC. They did the test at 45mph! This is simply not fast enough to create a difference. They needed to do it at 65 or 70mph. That may have shown a real difference.

Keep in mind that these guys are special effects experts, not engineers or scientists.
 
Yah, they do their best but they just can't compare to people that studied science in the first place.

I also wouldn't call any of their experiments "ground-breaking"... except maybe the break-step bridge because they literally broke the ground beneath them. :smile: :smile:
 
Some are ok.

I found them to be very wasteful more than anything.
 
Integral said:
It is a good show, but I do not always agree that they have busted the myths. For instance, Is it more effecient to drive with the windows down or use the AC. They did the test at 45mph! This is simply not fast enough to create a difference. They needed to do it at 65 or 70mph. That may have shown a real difference.

Agreed. If fact, I think an actual study showed that at low speeds it was more efficient to keep the windows open and at freeway speeds more efficient to use the AC.
 
Like I've said before, they often miss several important variables in their experiments.
 
  • #10
billthegeek said:
"Are teeth strong enough to withstand the force of a bullet?"


ummm... i don't think anyone needed mythbusters to get that one right
 
  • #11
cronxeh said:
ummm... i don't think anyone needed mythbusters to get that one right

go on their fansite. Some people believe anything.
 
  • #12
I think the show is awesome. I don't really care if it's wasteful or wrong, I just want to see them blow **** up.
 
  • #13
Yah, who cares if its wasteful. What does that even mean for a show to be wasteful? Do they consume tremendous amounts of coal or something?
 
  • #14
Pengwuino said:
Yah, who cares if its wasteful. What does that even mean for a show to be wasteful? Do they consume tremendous amounts of coal or something?

just racking up entropy i tell you
 
  • #15
Anyone catch the episode on the myth of one poor dude who got shot right thru his nether regions and the bullet subsequently hit a woman who got pregnant as a result of this. I wonder how they bust this myth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K