Does applying arccos() to both sides of an inequality preserve its relation?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
9 replies · 4K views
junaidnawaz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Please help me to confirm, weather the following step is correct

[tex]|\gamma| \leq \cos (\beta)[/tex]
[tex]\arccos (|\gamma|) \leq \beta[/tex]

does taking the arccos() on both sides of equation changes the relational operator??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi junaidnawaz! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a beta: β and a gamma: γ and a ≤ :wink:)

arccos is defined as being in [0,π)

so long as β is also in [0,π), your equations are the same (because cos is monotone in that region, and therefore so is arccos) :smile:
 
Thx v much for your reply.

in my case, the range of parameters is as,
[tex]0 \leq \beta \leq \pi /2[/tex]
[tex]-1 \leq \gamma \leq +1[/tex]

by taking arccos() on both-sides, would it change the operator (from [tex]\leq[/tex] to [tex]\geq[/tex] ) or would it remain same ??
 
junaidnawaz said:
by taking arccos() on both-sides, would it change the operator (from [tex]\leq[/tex] to [tex]\geq[/tex] ) or would it remain same ??

oh, i missed that! :rolleyes:

yes, cos is decreasing, so the ≤ changes to ≥ :smile:

(but, eg, sin is increasing, so the ≤ would stay the same :wink:)
 
Thank you.

if
[tex]|\gamma| \leq \cos( \beta )[/tex]

then

[tex]x \leq \beta[/tex]

can i find "x", by keeping the RHS fixed to [tex]\beta[/tex]

is this possible to find x ?? by keeping RHS and relation operator the same ??
 
[tex]|\gamma| \leq \cos ( \beta )[/tex]

When I take arccos() on both sides, it becomes

[tex]\arccos( |\gamma| ) \geq \beta[/tex]

however, i want to keep [tex]\beta[/tex] on right side, and i want to keep the relational operator as [tex]\leq[/tex], i.e.,

[tex]x \leq \beta[/tex]

what would be x ??
 
junaidnawaz said:
however, i want to keep [tex]\beta[/tex] on right side, and i want to keep the relational operator as [tex]\leq[/tex], i.e.,

[tex]x \leq \beta[/tex]

that's not possible (unless you replace β by some decreasing function of β, such as 1/β or -β)