Does BICEP2 kill Conformal Cyclic Cosmology?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter twistor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology Cyclic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of BICEP2 observations for Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC). Roger Penrose argues that the B-mode signals detected by BICEP2 may not be due to inflationary gravitational waves but rather primordial magnetic fields from the pre-Big Bang era. While some models, including those involving cosmic strings, remain viable, inflation theory currently holds a strong posterior probability based on extensive testing. The conversation emphasizes the need for caution as further research unfolds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of BICEP2 observations and their significance in cosmology
  • Familiarity with Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC) concepts
  • Knowledge of inflation theory and its implications in the early universe
  • Awareness of primordial magnetic fields and their role in cosmological models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of BICEP2 findings on inflation theory
  • Explore Roger Penrose's theories on primordial magnetic fields
  • Investigate cosmic strings and their potential effects on cosmic observations
  • Examine current models of CCC and their testability against new data
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the ongoing debates surrounding the early universe and the implications of BICEP2 observations.

twistor
Messages
74
Reaction score
8
Is CCC killed by BICEP2 or there is a way in which it survives?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Apparently it's still alive, because Roger doesn't believe in any of this newfangled inflation stuff. According to this interview with Ira Flatow:

http://www.sciencefriday.com/segment/04/04/2014/sir-roger-penrose-cosmic-inflation-is-fantasy.html

he attributes the B-mode observations, not to gravitational waves induced by quantum fluctuations during inflation, but to primordial magnetic fields left over from the pre-Big Bang.
 
Last edited:
Penrose's ideas about primordial B fields is a bit crazy and should be relatively straightforward to rule out. What's harder to do is to really remove all classical sources as a viable explanation. Indeed the Bicep signal could arise from cosmic strings or other early universe sources.

See eg
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.0542

For an example.

The good news is many of these models are testable as the resolution is increased and are already in tension with some of the findings at large angular scales. Since inflation has a very strong posterior probability after so many tests and is much cleaner theoretically I do think it is the significant leader at this point.

All of this is still the early days and it is wise to exercise caution
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
4K