I Does dark-energy require a source of energy?

AI Thread Summary
Dark energy, as described in the Lambda-CDM model, is associated with the curvature of space-time that causes the universe to expand over time, contributing to the Hubble flow. The discussion raises the question of whether dark energy requires an energy source or if it is merely a manifestation of space-time curvature. It is clarified that dark energy does not need an energy source, similar to how mass does not require one. The concept of dark energy is often linked to the vacuum energy in quantum field theory, but current estimates of this energy are significantly off from observations, highlighting unresolved issues in cosmology. Ultimately, dark energy remains a complex topic that intertwines with fundamental questions about the nature of the universe.
Herbascious J
Messages
165
Reaction score
7
TL;DR Summary
Does dark-energy require a source of energy if explained by general relativity and the Lamda-CDM model?
In the Lamda-CDM model of cosmology, dark-energy is explained by a Lamda like curvature of space-time. In this description, space-time is curved in such a way as to cause a gentle outward repulsive force on the large scale, expanding all of the universe over time. This is one cause of the Hubble flow.

In general relativity, when dealing with gravity, if a body falls toward a massive object, this is thought of as a release of potential energy into kinetic energy. The curvature of the gravitational field already exists and looks like a force. My question is if dark-energy is a curvature of space-time, wouldn’t this be more like a force, not a kind of energy? So the universe on the largest scales would be expanding not because energy is flowing into it to drive it apart against the force of gravity, but instead the expansion is the result of potential energy being released under the influence of a force.

So, does dark-energy require an energy source, or is it just the result of the curvature of space-time? Is that what is meant by "energy" or is there some other explanation as to why we call it dark-"energy"?

Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Dark energy is supposed to be a form of energy that, like any other, causes spacetime curvature. It is not itself spacetime curvature.

So no, it does not require an energy source any more than mass requires an energy source.

It's very tempting to equate dark energy with the quantum field theory idea of "energy of the vacuum", the energy that's just there in empty space. Back of the envelope estimates for this quantity (we don't know how to do a proper calculation) are off by 120 orders of magnitude compared to observation, though, so clearly there's something we aren't getting right.
 
  • Like
Likes Tanelorn, ohwilleke, vanhees71 and 2 others
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Tanelorn, ohwilleke, Astronuc and 2 others
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top