- #1
Zarathustra0
- 23
- 0
Since the actual mass-eigenstate gluons are not the simple red-antired, red-antigreen, etc. but rather linear combinations thereof, is color charge still absolutely conserved? It seems that if we (perhaps naïvely) treat a gluon as simply fluctuating from one of the color-anticolor combinations of which it is a superposition to another, this would result in the possibility that, e.g., a red up quark and antigreen up antiquark could annihilate into a red-antigreen gluon, which could then oscillate into a green-antired gluon and produce a green quark and antired antiquark, violating color conservation.
If this approach of oscillating gluons is in fact naïve to the point of inaccuracy and we simply imagine this gluon as a superposition of red-antigreen and green-antired in equal proportions (1/√2), ignoring the collapse into one state or the other upon observation, we have a sort of colorless state, with equal parts red and antired and equal parts green and antigreen. Really, regardless of how the intermediate gluon itself is viewed, its being a superposition would seem to allow the transition of a red quark and antigreen antiquark to a green quark and antired antiquark.
If this approach of oscillating gluons is in fact naïve to the point of inaccuracy and we simply imagine this gluon as a superposition of red-antigreen and green-antired in equal proportions (1/√2), ignoring the collapse into one state or the other upon observation, we have a sort of colorless state, with equal parts red and antired and equal parts green and antigreen. Really, regardless of how the intermediate gluon itself is viewed, its being a superposition would seem to allow the transition of a red quark and antigreen antiquark to a green quark and antired antiquark.