Does Increasing Distance Between Point Charges Really Increase Voltage?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Increasing the distance between point charges does indeed increase the voltage between points near them, contrary to the common understanding that this effect is limited to infinitely large charged plates. The voltage calculations show that as the distance between point charges increases, the voltage difference (ΔV) approaches a higher value. Specifically, when point charges Q and -Q are separated, the voltage at points P1 and P2 changes in a way that supports this conclusion. This behavior highlights the importance of considering point charges in discussions about voltage and electric fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and Coulomb's Law
  • Familiarity with voltage calculations using the formula V = q/(4πε₀r)
  • Knowledge of electric fields and their relationship to voltage
  • Basic calculus for understanding line integrals in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of voltage changes in electrostatic systems
  • Explore the concept of electric field intensity and its variations with distance
  • Learn about the line integral of electric fields and its applications
  • Utilize simulation tools or calculators for visualizing voltage and electric fields between point charges
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electrostatics and voltage behavior in electric fields.

DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
Today I was reflecting about the statement that increasing the distance between two large charged plates increases voltage, when I started to wonder what the behavior was near point charges (more voltage? as much? less?).

Q and -Q are charges. P1 and P2 are locations.

Q @ x=0m
P1 @ x=1m
P2 @ x=2m
-Q @ x=3m

V=\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r}
V=0 at r=infinity.

Let |Q| = 4\pi\epsilon_{0} so that being 1 meter from +Q (and only +Q) gives 1 V.

It's clear that voltage at V_{P1}=\frac{1}{2} and V_{P2}=-\frac{1}{2} and that \Delta V=1

Now increase the distance between the two points and charges. There are now 2 meters between the points, but each is just as close to their respective charges.

Q @ x=0m
P1 @ x=1m
P2 @ x=3m
-Q @ x=4m

Now: V_{P1}=\frac{2}{3} and V_{P2}=-\frac{2}{3} and \Delta V=\frac{4}{3}

As P2 and -Q get moved far away (but with P2 staying 1 meter from -Q), it's clear that \Delta V will approach 2.

Is it fair for me to deduce from this that increasing distance between point charges also increases voltage between points near them? If so, this would be surprising as I thought that only increasing distance between infinitely large plates increased voltage, because of the constant field intensity near infinitely large plates. I did not know this effect could also work for the simple case where field intensity actually drops with distance (as it does with point charges).

The implication is that if I wanted to give a charged particle maximum kinetic energy as it accelerates between these two charges, I would prefer these two charges to first be as distant as possible. This seems somehow counter-intuitive. Also, every time I see someone talk about increased distance resulting in increased voltage, it is for the case of charged plates. The more fundamental case of point charges also obeying this rule would seem to me to warrant priority as an example of this behavior.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


If you have q and -q and you separate them further, then yes the voltage increases,. It is not linear though like for charged planes.
 


Remember, voltage is the line integral of the electric field. Even though the electric field between the two points is less due to the increased separation (1.33X) of the charges, the increased distance in the integral (2X) more than makes up for it.

Here's a nifty calculator to determine the voltage and field at a point given one or two charges:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/e2p.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
547
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K