Does Intention or Interpretation Hold More Weight in Communication?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interpretation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of communication, specifically the influence of intention versus interpretation. It asserts that while the persuader's intention may seem significant, the recipient's interpretation ultimately determines the outcome of the interaction. The conversation highlights that personal judgments and external factors, such as time constraints and emotional barriers, can skew the effectiveness of communication. Thus, the quality of persuasion and the recipient's perspective are critical in understanding communication success.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of communication theories
  • Familiarity with psychological influences on decision-making
  • Knowledge of interpersonal dynamics
  • Awareness of emotional intelligence concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research communication models, focusing on intention versus interpretation
  • Explore psychological theories related to persuasion, such as Cialdini's principles
  • Study emotional intelligence and its impact on interpersonal communication
  • Investigate the role of context in shaping communication outcomes
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for communication professionals, psychologists, educators, and anyone interested in enhancing their interpersonal skills and understanding the complexities of human interactions.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Which carries a greater weight regarding the outcome of communication? E. g., if I encourage an individual to go out with me, and they respond according to their personal judgment, whose action would be more influential in the general milieu?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If by respond you mean they agree I venture to say the persuader had the greater influence on the outcome but this must be weighed (for whatever the reason?) by the quality of the persuasion required against the judgement of the persuaded. Then again maybe they blindsided you into 'persuading them' because this was their desire all along.
 
Maybe we often see ourselves as one when, in fact, we are the other.
 
Loren Booda said:
Maybe we often see ourselves as one when, in fact, we are the other.

the other person?
 
Encouraging an individual to go out, is disequally weighted. If energy of encouragement must be exerted, then the other person either has time constraints, doubts, aversion, xenophobia, or some other x factor. In the realm of human dynamics, intention can be an ill fitting garment that covers a host of other vying motivations. Many times people claim high intent, but it is just handy like a hat. See I have my hat on, let's go out.
 
Intention matters more to the intender, but the way the person you are communicating with takes your gesture is what will ultimately matter more to the success of your attempt to get your point across. If they take it the wrong way, they'll take it the wrong way, regardless of what you intend.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K