Does it make sense to say that something is almost infinite?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SSG-E
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the concept of "almost infinite," which lacks formal mathematical definition and is often used informally to describe extremely large numbers. Participants clarify that the first infinite ordinal, denoted as ##\omega##, is a limit ordinal with no predecessor, reinforcing the distinction between finite and infinite. The term "infinite dimensional" is defined as not finite dimensional in the context of vector spaces. The conversation also touches on large numbers such as Graham's number and Rayo's number, illustrating the vastness of numerical concepts beyond infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinal numbers, particularly the concept of limit ordinals.
  • Familiarity with infinite dimensional spaces in linear algebra.
  • Knowledge of large numbers and their representations, including Graham's number and Rayo's number.
  • Basic grasp of topology, particularly concepts related to compactification and metrics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of ordinal numbers, focusing on limit ordinals and their implications in set theory.
  • Study infinite dimensional vector spaces and their applications in functional analysis.
  • Research large numbers and their significance in mathematics, including Knuth's up-arrow notation.
  • Investigate topological concepts related to compactification and metrics on the real number line.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematics, and anyone interested in advanced numerical concepts and the philosophical implications of infinity.

SSG-E
Messages
60
Reaction score
12
TL;DR
Does it make sense to say that something is almost infinite? If yes, then why?
I remember hearing someone say "almost infinite" in this video. As someone who hasn't studied very much math, "almost infinite" sounds like nonsense. Either something ends or it doesn't, there really isn't a spectrum of unending-ness. In this video he says that ''almost infinite'' pieces of vertical lines are placed along X length. Why not infinit?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No I'm not aware of any sense in which 'almost infinite' makes formal sense. In practise, I guess it means "a very large number".

From a context of ordinal numbers, the first infinite ordinal ##\omega## has no predecessor, that is there is no ordinal ##\eta## such that ##\omega = \eta +1##. One says that ##\omega## is a limit ordinal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh and etotheipi
Math_QED said:
No I'm not aware of any sense in which 'almost infinite' makes sense.

From a context of ordinal numbers, the first infinite ordinal ##\omega## has no predecessor, that is there is no ordinal ##\eta## such that ##\omega = \eta +1##. One says that ##\omega## is a limit ordinal.
Then is it correct to say infinite pieces instead of almost infinite pieces in that video?
 
SSG-E said:
Then is it correct to say infinite pieces instead of almost infinite pieces in that video?

I did not say something like that. This video tries to intuitively explain what dimension is. You shouldn't be looking for rigorous explanations in videos like that, but just to get a 'feeling' for the subject.

Infinite dimensional just means NOT finite dimensional (in the context of vector spaces at least).
 
Math_QED said:
I did not say something like that. This video tries to intuitively explain what dimension is. You shouldn't be looking for rigorous explanations in videos like that, but just to get a 'feeling' for the subject.

Infinite dimensional just means NOT finite dimensional (in the context of vector spaces at least).
I don't get it
 
Things are either finite or infinite. There is no formal definition for almost infinite. Informally as @Math_QED said it means a really large number likely a number you can't write down in a reasonable amount of time.

Some famous cases of numbers are:

  • googol =
    10^{{100}}.
  • centillion =
    10^{303}
    or
    10^{600}
    , depending on number naming system.
  • millillion =
    {\displaystyle 10^{3003}}
    or
    {\displaystyle 10^{6000}}
    , depending on number naming system.
  • micrillion =
    {\displaystyle 10^{3000003}}
    or
    {\displaystyle 10^{6000000}}
    , depending on number naming system.
  • The largest known Smith number = (101031−1) × (104594 + 3×102297 + 1)1476 ×103913210.
  • The largest known Mersenne prime =
    {\displaystyle 2^{82,589,933}-1}
    (as of December 21, 2018),
  • googolplex =
    10^{\text{googol}}=10^{10^{100}}
    .
  • Skewes' numbers: the first is approximately
    10^{10^{10^{34}}}
    , the second
    10^{10^{10^{964}}}
    ,
  • googolplexian =
    {\displaystyle 10^{\text{googolplex}}=10^{10^{\text{googol}}}=10^{10^{10^{100}}}}
    .
  • Graham's number, larger than what can be represented even using power towers (tetration). However, it can be represented using Knuth's up-arrow notation.
  • Rayo's number is a large number named after Agustín Rayo which has been claimed to be the largest named number. It was originally defined in a "big number duel" at MIT on 26 January 2007.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_numbers

It's like games of chance where people like to say they almost won. They either won or they lost there is nothing in between. You either won the money or lost the money but almost won sounds better especially when talking to your spouse.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh, etotheipi, SSG-E and 1 other person
One could come up with a topological notion of "almost infinite". Consider, for instance the real number line compactified into a circle by adjoining a point at +/- infinity. Impose a topology on this circle by considering that the distance (metric) between a point x and infinity is given by ##\frac{1}{\text{max}(1,|x|)}##

[I suspect one might have to juice up this metric a bit to make sure it obeys the triangle inequality. The easy way is to use the induced metric from the circle. Now all you have to do is map real values plus infinity to a circle -- something like arc-tangent]

Now you have a notion of "almost infinite" -- 1,000,000 is only 1/1,000,000 away from infinity.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
jbriggs444 said:
Consider, for instance the real number line compactified into a circle by adjoining a point at +/- infinity
Or even map all complex numbers onto a sphere (the Riemann sphere):
1591811906765.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog and etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K