Does juxtaposition always show multiplication?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter C0nfused
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiplication
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Juxtaposition in mathematics generally indicates multiplication, but exceptions exist, such as the interpretation of numbers like 23, which should be read as "twenty-three" rather than "2 times 3." Additionally, functions are denoted as f(x), not as f*x. Proper use of parentheses is crucial for clarity, especially in complex expressions. Fractions can include irrational numbers, and proper notation is essential to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical notation and operations
  • Familiarity with functions and their representations
  • Knowledge of parentheses conventions in mathematics
  • Basic concepts of fractions, including irrational numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rules of mathematical notation for clarity
  • Learn about function notation and its implications
  • Research the importance of parentheses in mathematical expressions
  • Explore the properties of fractions, including those involving irrational numbers
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and anyone involved in mathematics who seeks to improve their understanding of notation and operations, particularly in algebra and calculus.

C0nfused
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
I just want to make something clear: does juxtaposition always show multiplication? For example 2ab(c+d)e(pi)=2*a*b*(c+d)*e*(pi) ? Generally it applies to any multiplication as long as there are no confusions,despite the number of factors?(obviously 23 is not 2*3!) ?
And one more thing: when we write
a+b
---- we mean (a+b):(c-d) ? In other worlds the fraction bar shows that
c-d
everything that is above it, after it's calculated ,is divided with the final value of the expression under it, right? Is this always called a fraction?For example when a is irrational is it called a fraction? In any case every rule applied to fractions applies to this kind of "fraction" too? They are general rules of division?(example a a*c
- = ----
b b*c )
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, C0nfused:
These are very important questions, because an unambiguous notation is absolutely essential in mathematics!

So:
Juxtaposition rule:
You are right, but there are a couple of important exceptions:
1) 23 should ALWAYS be read as "twenty-three", never "2 times 3".
In general, juxtaposed digits are to be read in the "usual" manner we learn in school.
The following is a really bad notation:
2*a*3=2a3; the right hand side is plain awful; either keep the explicit left hand side, or rewrite it as 6a.

2) Functions:
If you have a function f of x, it is common to write the value as f(x).
This does NOT mean f*x!

Parenthesis rule:
Parentheses is one of the most important notational tools to get an unambiguous notation. Hence, study parenthesis conventions thouroughly!

Fractions:
If you haven't access to a good formatting program, you should ALWAYS enclose complicated denominators and numerators in brackets.
For example:
(a+3b+45)/(d-14e+f) is unambiguous, whereas a+3b+45/d-14e+f not only invites confusion, but is plain wrong.
The only explicit fraction in the last expression is 45/d, which is something completely different..

And yes, we may call an expression a/b a fraction even if either a or b (or both) is irrational.

Welcome to PF, by the way!
 
Last edited:
Thank you arildno for your really helpful and accurate answer
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
26K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K