Does Matter Truly Occupy Space or is it Merely Energy in a Certain State?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter big_bounce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Matter Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of matter and its relationship with space, particularly through the lens of photons and mass. It establishes that while mass is a well-defined concept measured in kilograms, the term "matter" is ill-defined and can lead to confusion. Fundamental particles, such as photons, are considered point particles that occupy no volume, suggesting that matter may be better understood as energy in a specific state rather than a tangible entity occupying space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and fundamental particles
  • Familiarity with concepts of volume and spatial occupancy in physics
  • Awareness of the philosophical implications of defining matter
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Einstein's mass-energy equivalence and its implications in modern physics
  • Explore the properties of fundamental particles and their classification
  • Study the concept of vacuum and its role in quantum field theory
  • Investigate philosophical perspectives on the nature of matter and energy
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of matter and energy in the universe.

big_bounce
Messages
102
Reaction score
3
Hello all .
I have a little problem hope you will solution it .

Suppose there is a box that inside it is vacuum and Suppose box is massless .
Consider we import one million photons in the box
Now box has mass equal to m=E/c^2 and E is total energy of photons .
In this case , inside box should not occupy space because photons do not occupy space .
I know this example is not very good for particles but much same .

So i think just matter can occupy space because it has many properties and one of them is mass . right or wrong ?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Matter is ill defined. Mass is well defined. If you want to think about things scientifically, I would forget the word "matter". Its not going to help.

Mass is that which has the unit of kilogram, or equivalent. Fundamental particles are considered to be point particles. That means they occupy no volume.

Volume is not a property of fundamental particles. You only get a volume when you have many particles together and can roughly enclose an area with them. Or you might be able to get a volume out of one particle by considering the average space it resides in. This can get complex...
 
Closer to the truth, its even better to think of matter as nothing substantial, unsolid, it is merely energy manifesting itself in a certain state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K