Can the centre of mass do work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of whether energy can be extracted from a system where two equal masses are moving away from each other, particularly focusing on the role of the center of mass and the nature of collisions within a closed system. The scope includes theoretical considerations of energy transfer, elastic and inelastic collisions, and potential work extraction mechanisms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a system with two equal masses moving apart, suggesting that the center of mass has no speed and questioning how energy can be stored and extracted from such a system.
  • Another participant proposes that energy can be extracted if the collisions with the walls of the box are inelastic, indicating that this is how heat transfer occurs.
  • A subsequent reply confirms that energy extraction is not possible with elastic collisions, as the kinetic energy remains unchanged in such scenarios.
  • One participant introduces a modified system involving a cylinder and a piston, where elastic collisions with the top of the cylinder can push the top upward, allowing for energy harvesting from the moving top, while removing kinetic energy from the balls.
  • Another participant agrees that this piston system behaves similarly to an ideal gas, suggesting a parallel in energy dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which energy can be extracted from the system. There is agreement that elastic collisions do not allow for energy extraction, while inelastic collisions do. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of these findings in different system configurations.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on specific definitions of elastic and inelastic collisions, and the discussion does not resolve the implications of these definitions in various theoretical contexts. The assumptions about the nature of energy storage and transfer in the proposed systems are not fully explored.

albertrichardf
Messages
165
Reaction score
11
Hello,

Consider two equal masses moving away from each other at the same speed. The total momentum of the system is zero, so the total momentum of the system is zero. Therefore, the centre of mass has no speed.

The total energy in the system is ##mv^2##, due to the kinetic energy of the two masses. The energy of the centre of mass must be stored in some other way, because the kinetic energy of the centre is zero. It would be the "internal energy" of the centre, just like an ideal gas has internal energy due to the kinetic energy of its molecules.

Suppose, now we create an ideal box, one for which all collisions with the inner walls are perfectly elastic. We can take the system we imagined, and place it in the box. The box is then sealed. Inside the box, the masses go back and forth, colliding with the walls of the box, and colliding with each other. However, it is arranged so that the total momentum of the masses at any instant is zero. The box then contains some energy ##mv^2##.

My question is, can we extract that energy and do work with it without ever opening the box? Ideal gasses allow this energy to be detected by increasing the temperature of the box. By placing the box with something at a lower temperature we can extract work. Is there a macroscopic equivalent to that?

Thanks for answering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Albertrichardf said:
My question is, can we extract that energy and do work with it without ever opening the box?
Sure. Let the collisions with the wall be inelastic. That is how heat is transferred too.
 
Dale said:
Sure. Let the collisions with the wall be inelastic. That is how heat is transferred too.
Thanks for answering. So there is no way of extracting energy, unless the collisions are inelastic?
 
Albertrichardf said:
Thanks for answering. So there is no way of extracting energy, unless the collisions are inelastic?
Correct. That is the definition of an elastic collision.

Edit: note @jbriggs444 has a more clever solution below
 
Last edited:
Dale said:
Correct. That is the definition of an elastic collision.
That makes sense: since the kinetic energy of a system with solely elastic collisions can't change, you shouldn't be able to extract any energy from it either. Thank for clearing it up.
 
Suppose that instead of a rigid box, we have one with a fixed bottom, tall fixed sides and a top that is free to slide up and down. i.e. A cylinder and a piston.

Balls inside the cylinder can collide with the top. These collisions are elastic -- total kinetic energy of top plus balls is unchanged. But the top is pushed upward as a result. One could harvest the energy of the moving top. The net effect would be to remove kinetic energy from the balls.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Suppose that instead of a rigid box, we have one with a fixed bottom, tall fixed sides and a top that is free to slide up and down. i.e. A cylinder and a piston.

Balls inside the cylinder can collide with the top. These collisions are elastic -- total kinetic energy of top plus balls is unchanged. But the top is pushed upward as a result. One could harvest the energy of the moving top. The net effect would be to remove kinetic energy from the balls.
Thanks for the answer. It does make sense that such a system would behave like an ideal gas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K