Does our perception of time vary based on our location in the universe?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter James Mitchell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perception Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether our perception of time varies based on our location in the universe, particularly in relation to the concept of 'now' and individual experiences of time. The scope includes elements of psychology and physics, particularly the relativity of simultaneity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if their differing experiences of falling asleep could affect their perception of 'now' and whether it leads to a temporal dissonance in their interactions.
  • Another participant asserts that the question does not pertain to physics, suggesting it is more psychological in nature.
  • A later reply clarifies that the relativity of simultaneity is about objective agreement on events between observers in motion, not individual perceptions of time.
  • One participant acknowledges the clarification, indicating an understanding that conscious experience does not alter perceived placement within time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the original question does not align with physics concepts and is more related to psychological perceptions of time. However, there is no consensus on the implications of this distinction.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the relationship between subjective experiences of time and established physical theories, particularly regarding the relativity of simultaneity.

James Mitchell
My understanding of the concepts involved in my question are very limited so please forgive me if this is an utterly stupid question..

I recently learned that depending on where you are in the universe, your perception of 'now' changes. I was pondering this whilst trying to get to sleep, next to my already sleeping partner. She always drops off around ten minutes after we switch the lights off, whereas I take at least an hour. Which got me wondering:

For arguments sake, let's say my girlfriend falls asleep at exactly 10pm, myself an hour later at 11. We hypothetically both sleep soundly through the night without disturbance of any kind, and wake up at exactly the same moment the following morning at 7am when the alarm goes off. Because my conscious mind has experienced an hours worth of time more than her, does that put her 'now' out of sync with mine? Could every interaction we have occur to her an hour earlier than it does for me?

As I said I have absolutely no idea what I am talking about, for all I know this has nothing whatsoever to do with physics!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right, nothing to do with physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: James Mitchell
Fair enough! Thank you for replying
 
The relativity of simultaneity that you were probably thinking about in the first place, has got nothing to do with individual perception of the passage of time. It's about whether two observers can objectively agree on the time and place of some event, providing the observers are not stationary w/r to each other (and moving at high speeds, as otherwise it's an imperceptible effect).
The issue you ended up thinking about has got more to do with psychology than any physics. You're both collocated in space-time, so relativity of simultaneity doesn't come into play.
 
So the amount of time we consciously experience has no bearing on our perceived placement within it, I see. That makes sense, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
90
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K