- 24,488
- 15,057
No matter, which subject in physics you consider there's no reason to develop an anxiety, because what physics as a natural science does is simply to observe Nature and try to order the findings of these observations in mathematical theories and models, i.e., it doesn't and can not change anything what's not "there" in Nature.EclogiteFacies said:So to avoid having to make another thread and getting this off my chest.
My anxiety regarding special relativity and my notion of other observers is misfounded.
In the context of relativity, it's clear that relativity simply is a better way to order events in space and time than the Newtonian space-time description is. Of course, as far as we know at the present stage of scientific knowledge, Nature always was behaving more as described by relativity than by Newtonian physics. Newtonian physics is simply a theory, though being very successful within its realm of applicability, which has a limit range of applicability. It could also well be that one day one finds by an observation that also (general) relativity is only approximately valid within some limited range of applicability.
So there is no reason to be anxious about anything we find out by using the scientific method. It's always to be expected that you find more accurate descriptions about the phenomena in Nature, which of course occur independent of our descriptions.