Does quantum gravity argue that space is not singularly....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between quantum gravity and the concept of space being occupied solely by rectilinear motion. Participants express confusion regarding the implications of quantum gravity on traditional views of motion as established by general relativity. The inquiry suggests that quantum gravity may challenge the notion of singular, rectilinear motion, particularly in the context of parallel motion between particles. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding these complex gravitational concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of general relativity principles
  • Familiarity with quantum gravity concepts
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics and motion
  • Awareness of particle physics and interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum gravity on classical motion theories
  • Study the differences between rectilinear and parallel motion in physics
  • Explore the foundational principles of general relativity and their quantum counterparts
  • Investigate current theories and experiments in quantum gravity
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those interested in the intersections of quantum mechanics and general relativity, as well as anyone exploring advanced gravitational theories.

dtrain92pitt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does quantum gravity argue that space is not singularly occupied by rectilinear motion?I am reading a general relativity intro sort of thing and this inquiry popped up in my mind. The text was explicating space being occupied by only rectilinear motion and I wondered if quantum gravity could be the antithesis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This was completely unclear. Are you using an auto-translator? Maybe another one would work better.
 
Excuse me if I'm unclear, I've only recently begun with grasping gravitational study. My understanding of relativity is one of singular, rectilinear motion. Since it was established by classical methods, I wondered what that entailed by quantum means.
 
dtrain92pitt said:
Excuse me if I'm unclear, I've only recently begun with grasping gravitational study. My understanding of relativity is one of singular, rectilinear motion. Since it was established by classical methods, I wondered what that entailed by quantum means.
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you mean by "singular, rectilinear motion".
 
I mean parallel motion between two particles. Does gravity not consist of its own?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K