Does quantum gravity argue that space is not singularly....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between quantum gravity and the concept of space being occupied by rectilinear motion. Participants explore whether quantum gravity presents an alternative view to the classical understanding of motion in space, particularly in the context of general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether quantum gravity suggests that space is not solely defined by rectilinear motion, as described in classical theories.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the initial inquiry, suggesting a need for clearer communication.
  • A participant reflects on their limited understanding of gravitational concepts and seeks to connect classical ideas of motion with quantum perspectives.
  • There is a clarification attempt regarding the term "singular, rectilinear motion," with a focus on parallel motion between particles and its relation to gravity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with participants expressing varying levels of understanding and clarity about the concepts being discussed. Multiple interpretations of motion and gravity are present.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a lack of clarity in definitions and concepts, particularly regarding the terminology used to describe motion in the context of gravity.

dtrain92pitt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does quantum gravity argue that space is not singularly occupied by rectilinear motion?I am reading a general relativity intro sort of thing and this inquiry popped up in my mind. The text was explicating space being occupied by only rectilinear motion and I wondered if quantum gravity could be the antithesis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This was completely unclear. Are you using an auto-translator? Maybe another one would work better.
 
Excuse me if I'm unclear, I've only recently begun with grasping gravitational study. My understanding of relativity is one of singular, rectilinear motion. Since it was established by classical methods, I wondered what that entailed by quantum means.
 
dtrain92pitt said:
Excuse me if I'm unclear, I've only recently begun with grasping gravitational study. My understanding of relativity is one of singular, rectilinear motion. Since it was established by classical methods, I wondered what that entailed by quantum means.
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you mean by "singular, rectilinear motion".
 
I mean parallel motion between two particles. Does gravity not consist of its own?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K