Does quantum mechanics say everything is random?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of randomness in quantum mechanics, particularly whether quantum mechanics implies that everything is random or if determinism can be observed at macroscopic levels. Participants explore the implications of quantum unpredictability and the interpretations of quantum mechanics, including the role of measurements and the Schrödinger equation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while quantum events introduce randomness, macroscopic phenomena can appear deterministic due to the negligible impact of quantum variance.
  • Others argue that the statement "everything's random" is overly broad and lacks meaning without precise definitions, noting that certain conservation laws remain intact even at the quantum level.
  • One participant emphasizes that the evolution of a wavefunction is deterministic according to the Schrödinger equation, and randomness arises only during measurement interactions with classical objects.
  • Another viewpoint highlights the many-worlds interpretation, which posits that state reduction does not occur, suggesting a fully deterministic framework in that context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of randomness and determinism in quantum mechanics, with no consensus reached on the implications of quantum unpredictability or the definitions of randomness.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of defining measurement and randomness, as well as the challenges in reconciling quantum mechanics with classical determinism. The discussion reflects various interpretations of quantum mechanics, including standard and many-worlds interpretations, without resolving the underlying disagreements.

SeventhSigma
Messages
256
Reaction score
0
Does quantum mechanics say "Everything's random at the quantum scale, but on a macroscopic level, it's pretty much deterministic. It's still random, but deterministic in the sense that the variance attributable to quantum events is vanishingly small"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Everything's random" is much too broad to be meaningful. There is zero probability of a violation of conservation of energy, even at the atomic scale. There is zero probability that the charge of an electron will fluctuate.

It's also difficult to define randomness in a meaningful way. The evolution of a wavefunction according to the Schrödinger equation is completely deterministic. There is no randomness in the many-worlds interpretation.

IMO there is no meaningful answer to your question unless you refine it by defining more clearly what you mean.
 
Okay, what I mean is that we say, on a quantum level, that some things are unpredictable. We can predict things according to distribution, but some things we can't label as fully deterministic even if the wavefunction is.

Therefore, we've always said "it's possible" to materialize on the other side of the moon, but we say it's super improbable because the position function for anyone particle becomes crazy unlikely when we're talking about a distance that large (untold standard deviations away), and also unlikely when you consider that ALL particles of your body would have to do this at once, etc.

In other words, on macroscopic levels, we're not *fully* deterministic -- but even in systems where we can predict outcomes with virtually 100% accuracy, the quantum unpredictability will have little impact on the unexplained variance.
 
In standard interpretation, when a measurement is made, the outcome is random, with probability given by the state vector of the system.
Defining when measurement happens is tricky. A good rule is to say that if the resulting state vector can practically be returned to the original state vector, then measurement has not yet occurred.
When a classical object gets entangled with the quantum state, the state vector now describes a many-particle state which is practically impossible to write down. Therefore measurement happens when a classical object gets entangled with the original state.
So the 'randomness' gets brought in when the quantum system interacts with a classical object. The classical object could be a Geiger counter, or a cat, or the air around us.
So the quantum state evolves deterministically due to the Schrödinger equation, until a classical object makes a measurement, which causes state reduction (which is non-deterministic).
There is another interpretation called many-worlds, where state reduction never happens, so everything is deterministic in many-worlds interpretation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K