I Does the amount of hidden mass remain constant?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter user-000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Matter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the constancy of dark matter's mass in the universe over time, particularly in relation to dark energy. While dark energy's density remains constant, the density of baryonic and dark matter decreases, leading to a declining percentage of matter in the universe. The LambdaCDM model posits that the absolute amount of dark matter remains approximately constant since the Big Bang, despite potential processes like annihilation or decay. Baryonic matter is consumed more rapidly than dark matter, suggesting a gradual increase in the relative amount of dark matter. Overall, leading dark matter theories assume any changes in dark matter quantity are statistically insignificant compared to its total amount.
user-000
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
According to the dark matter theories is the total percentage of the dark matter's mass across the Universe remains constant as time passes?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Dark energy has constant density while the density of matter (baryonic and dark) goes down, so on a percentage of mass/energy basis, the percentage of matter is going down.

Excluding dark energy, I suspect you're asking about the ratio of baryonic matter to dark matter (about 1:5 ratio). But either can fall into a black hole and cease to be distinct as either class. It's just a mass parameter then. Dark matter is also less likely to be captured by any small gravity well, so as for the percentage that remains outside the black holes, I would suspect that dark matter is gaining, however slowly.

Baryonic matter is consumed faster by stellar combustion, so there's another way that dark matter gains over time.
 
user-000 said:
According to the dark matter theories is the total percentage of the dark matter's mass across the Universe remains constant as time passes?
In the LambdaCDM "Standard Model of Cosmology" and most variants of it, the absolute amount of dark matter in the Universe (really, the "observable universe") remains constant for the purposes of the model, after it comes into being not long after the Big Bang, but the percentage of the total mass-energy of the Universe which is dark matter declines over time as the amount and proportion of the mass-energy of the Universe that is dark energy grows over time.

As a practical matter, the absolute amount of dark matter does not have to be exactly constant to make theories like LambaCDM work. It merely has to be approximately constant over a 13.5 billion year plus time period.

I say "approximately constant" because there are some means by which, for particular dark matter candidates, it can annihilate or decay, in addition to being sucked into black holes as mentioned in post #2 in this thread. Also, for dark matter candidates that are not thermal freeze out dark matter candidates, such as axion dark matter candidates, dark matter candidates can fit the model if they are created and destroyed on a regular basis in roughly equal amounts (or exactly equal amounts, depending upon the theory).

But any process that adjusts the amount of dark matter over time up or down is assumed to be statistically insignificant, relative to the total amount of dark matter in the universe, in all leading dark matter theories, when considering the uncertainties in our astronomy observations from which the proportion of the mass-energy of the universe that is dark matter is estimated.
 
Last edited:
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Featured
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top