Does the Initial Energy Affect the Final Energy in a Central Force System?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a central force system involving two particles connected by a string, with one particle moving on a table and the other hanging below. The key equation derived relates the radial distance of the moving particle to its initial energy and angular momentum, indicating that initial conditions significantly influence final energy states. A participant expresses confusion regarding the gravitational energy term in their calculations, suggesting that the initial energy should account for the height difference of the hanging particle. They also question the conditions under which the hanging particle does not pass through the hole, indicating a need for a bounded orbit. The conversation highlights the complexities of energy conservation and the impact of initial conditions in such systems.
iSY
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've spent quite a while trying to figure this out but can't quite seem to get there... any ideas?

1. The Question
Two particles of mass m are connected by a light inextensible string of length l. One of the particles moves on a smooth horizontal table in which there is a small hole. The string passes through the hole so that the second particle hangs vertically below the hole. Use the conservation of energy and angular momentum to show that:

<br /> <br /> {\dot{r}}^2 = \frac{gl + {v}^2}{2} - \frac{{l}^2{v}^2}{8r^2} -g r<br /> <br />

where r(t) is the distance of the first particle from the hole, A and B are constants and g is the acceleration due to gravity. [Hint: Use polar coordinates in the plane of the table with the origin at the hole].

Given that the particle on the table is a distance l/2 from the hole and is moving with a speed v, directed perpendicular to the string, find the condition that the particle below the table does not pass through the hole. [Ans: \inline {v}^2 \leq 4gl/3]

What would happen if: \inline {v}^2 \leq gl/2?

2. My attempt at a solution
I managed to get a similar expression. Assuming the mass is traveling at a speed v on the table:
E_i = \frac {1}{2} m {v}^2
and the angular momentum is:
L_i = m v \frac {l}{2}
I'm not sure if this is valid, but it seemed to work.

Then I got the final energy as:
E_f = 2(\frac{1}{2}m {\dot{r}}^2) + \frac{{L}^2}{2 m {r}^2} -mg(l-r)

Then substituting for the angular momentum and setting the initial and final energies equal I get:

{\dot{r}}^2 = gl + \frac{{v}^2}{2} - \frac{{(vl)}^2}{8{r}^2} -gr

So I'm out by a half for the g*l term. I'm sure this has something to do with the intial energy but I can't explain why.

For the second part I assume the orbit must be bounded, so the Energy must be less than zero, but I cannot seem to get the answer stated.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression for the initial energy doesn't include a term for gravitational energy. mg(l-r) is not 0 when r = l/2.
 
I thought that there would be no gravitational energy initially if both particles are at the plane of the table. Then when one fall through the halls its change in height is -(l-r). Could this be where my assumption is wrong?
 
well it says "Given that the particle on the table is a distance l/2 from the hole". The other particle must be l/2 below the hole. Having the string started in a non-stretched position and the particle falling down until the string is stretched is problematic because the collision after the particle falls is probably unelastic.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
842
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
335
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
737