Does the Sun's composition of hydrogen make it prone to explosion?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nakisima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sun The sun
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the Sun, primarily composed of hydrogen, does not explode due to the balance of nuclear fusion and gravitational forces. While hydrogen is explosive in the presence of oxygen, the Sun's fusion process operates at equilibrium, preventing any explosive reactions. The Hindenburg disaster is referenced to illustrate hydrogen's explosive potential, but it is emphasized that helium is inert and does not contribute to explosions. The Sun's extreme temperatures also prevent the formation of chemical bonds necessary for combustion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Nuclear fusion principles
  • Basic chemistry of hydrogen and helium
  • Understanding of stellar equilibrium
  • Knowledge of combustion and chemical reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of nuclear fusion in stars
  • Research the chemical properties of hydrogen and helium
  • Explore stellar life cycles and equilibrium states
  • Investigate the chemistry behind combustion and explosions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, chemistry students, and anyone interested in understanding stellar dynamics and the properties of elements involved in fusion and combustion.

Nakisima
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I've recreated one of the first experiments I did in Chemistry many times - Water electrolysis to split it into Hydrogen and Oxygen, and prove the existence of hydrogen with a burning splint that goes "pop" in the test tube. The Sun is a massive ball of hydrogen, that uses Nuclear fusion to turn it into Helium. Helium explodes; the Hindenburg proved it, and so does Hydrogen, so why doesn't the sun just explode?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oy.

The Hindenberg was filled with hydrogen, so it exploded when mixed with air (oxygen). Helium is not reactive.

The sun's fusion is at equilibrium. The more energy generated by fusion, the more the sun wants to fly apart, but if it flies apart it doesn't create enough pressure to create fusion. Some stars actually oscillate, expanding and contracting over and over, but in the main sequence they are in a stable equilibrium.
 
Nakisima said:
I've recreated one of the first experiments I did in Chemistry many times - Water electrolysis to split it into Hydrogen and Oxygen, and prove the existence of hydrogen with a burning splint that goes "pop" in the test tube. The Sun is a massive ball of hydrogen, that uses Nuclear fusion to turn it into Helium. Helium explodes; the Hindenburg proved it, and so does Hydrogen, so why doesn't the sun just explode?

A chemical explosion of the variety you are referring to is usually caused by something burning very quickly, which requires oxygen. There is only a small amount of oxygen in the sun (in comparison to hydrogen) so it would never actually manage to burn. Not the mention the fact that the sun itself is too hot for molecules to form as any chemical bonds formed would break immediatly. Also the Hindenburg Airship used Hydrogen for buoyancy not Helium, Helium is inert and hence doesn't burn.
 
russ_watters said:
Oy.

The Hindenberg was filled with hydrogen

My mistake, history was not my forte.
 
Nakisima said:
My mistake, history was not my forte.

Another point of history is that the great big flames from the Hindenberg were from the fabric coating the airship's structure - it was painted with highly flammable aluminum compounds. While the hydrogen did burn, the real trigger for the disaster was ignition of the fabric.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K