- #1
ScottVal
- 15
- 0
- TL;DR Summary
- There's a YouTube video which says the universe is 92 billion light years wide; is this true?
Hello-
I just watched (or tried to watch) a YouTube video by Fermilab, in which the speaker states that the universe has a definite "width" of 92 billion light years. I could only watch about half of it because more and more terms were used which it am not familiar with. Besides, his pedantic nature is very annoying. I made the following comment on YouTube:
You lost me when you talked about "space expanding." I guess the video is meant for people who already understand that concept (which I don't). However, I pondered the idea of the universe having finite size several years ago, and got some help from some people on a physics forum, and I concluded that the question is sort of a paradox, because, if the universe had a finite size, you could imagine an inhabited planet on the edge of the universe, and the people who lived there would see the cosmos only on one side of their celestial sphere, which wouldn't make much sense. I think it makes more sense to consider the universe as having an indefinite size. I.e., you see galaxies in all directions, no matter where you are.
The video has about 4000 comments, so I'm not expecting anyone to reply to my comment. However, this forum seems like a smaller group, and I was wondering what you all think of this...
-Scott V.
I just watched (or tried to watch) a YouTube video by Fermilab, in which the speaker states that the universe has a definite "width" of 92 billion light years. I could only watch about half of it because more and more terms were used which it am not familiar with. Besides, his pedantic nature is very annoying. I made the following comment on YouTube:
You lost me when you talked about "space expanding." I guess the video is meant for people who already understand that concept (which I don't). However, I pondered the idea of the universe having finite size several years ago, and got some help from some people on a physics forum, and I concluded that the question is sort of a paradox, because, if the universe had a finite size, you could imagine an inhabited planet on the edge of the universe, and the people who lived there would see the cosmos only on one side of their celestial sphere, which wouldn't make much sense. I think it makes more sense to consider the universe as having an indefinite size. I.e., you see galaxies in all directions, no matter where you are.
The video has about 4000 comments, so I'm not expecting anyone to reply to my comment. However, this forum seems like a smaller group, and I was wondering what you all think of this...
-Scott V.