Does This Function Satisfy the Parallelogram Property?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tenshou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Symmetric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the function ##\psi(x) = f(x)\theta[g(x)] - g(x)\theta[f(x)]## satisfies the parallelogram property and the relation ##\psi(\lambda x) = \lambda^2 \psi(x)##. Participants emphasize the importance of visualizing the functions as vectors to understand the negative sign's origin. The concept of ##\psi(x)## being akin to an inner product is highlighted, suggesting that establishing it as a quadratic form is crucial for proving the properties in question.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear independence in function spaces
  • Familiarity with additive maps and their properties
  • Knowledge of quadratic forms and norms in mathematical analysis
  • Basic concepts of vector representation in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of additive maps in functional analysis
  • Study the characteristics of quadratic forms and their applications
  • Investigate the parallelogram law in the context of normed spaces
  • Learn about inner products and their geometric interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of functional analysis, and anyone studying properties of linear functions and their geometric interpretations will benefit from this discussion.

Tenshou
Messages
153
Reaction score
1
I am having problems showing the following:

##f## and ##g## are two linearly independent functions in ##E## and ##\theta : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}## is an additive map such that ##\theta(\mu \nu) = \theta(\mu)\nu +\mu \theta(\nu); \mu,\nu \in \mathbb{R}##. Show that the function;

##\psi \left(x\right)## ##=## ##f \left(x\right)\theta \left[g\left(x\right)\right]## ##-g\left(x\right)\theta\left[f\left(x\right)\right]##

satisfies the parallelogram property and the relation ##\psi\left(\lambda x\right)=\lambda ^{2}\psi\left(x\right)##.

Okay, so, I don't know where to start; I understand that I can begin to look at the picture of the parallelogram id. and show the similarities, like when the minus sign comes from. If you picture the two functions as vectors you can see that the minus sign comes from the direction in which the ##g## vector in directed
Parallelogram_law.PNG
and the same with ##f##, but after this, I cannot "show" it satisfies the second property.

PS: Think of ##\psi\left(x\right)## as being the inner product of ##x## with itself.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Tenshou.

The relation looks like its a standard norm property (i.e. a quadratic form). Is that useful for you? (If you can show its a quadratic form or a norm like object the rest should follow).
 
Thanks Chiro that actually seems like it will help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
947