Domain of Sturm-Liouville operators

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hellofolks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain Operators
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the domain of Sturm-Liouville operators, specifically focusing on whether the subspaces defined by boundary conditions are closed in the context of L^2 spaces. Participants explore the implications of this closure for completeness and the application of spectral theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the subspaces defined by boundary conditions for Sturm-Liouville operators are closed in L^2, which would imply completeness and Hilbert space properties.
  • One participant suggests that the relevant Hilbert space is not the subspace of C^2 functions, which is not complete with respect to the L^2 norm, but rather the completion of that subspace.
  • Another participant proposes a description of the completion as the set of equivalence classes of square-integrable functions that satisfy the boundary conditions, emphasizing the importance of the equivalence relation based on measure zero differences.
  • A participant notes that the completion detail is often not addressed in textbooks, prompting a question about the reasons for this omission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the closure of the subspaces and the nature of their completion. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these properties for Sturm-Liouville operators.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in existing literature regarding the treatment of Sturm-Liouville operators and their domains, particularly concerning the closure and completeness of the relevant subspaces.

hellofolks
Messages
33
Reaction score
2
Hello, folks,

A Sturm-Liouville operator is typically defined not on the whole space of [itex]C^2[/itex] functions,
but rather on some subspace described by boundary conditions. My question is: are those subspaces closed (hence complete, hence Hilbert) in [itex]L^2[/itex]? In case of an affirmative answer, how
can one prove that?

I've been searching for this answer in books, but apparently they don't even bother to consider
that operators are defined in subspaces of [itex]L^2[/itex] and go on applying spectral theory to
them as if they were defined on a Hilbert space.

Please, let me know if the question was not clear.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hellofolks said:
Hello, folks,

A Sturm-Liouville operator is typically defined not on the whole space of [itex]C^2[/itex] functions,
but rather on some subspace described by boundary conditions. My question is: are those subspaces closed (hence complete, hence Hilbert) in [itex]L^2[/itex]? In case of an affirmative answer, how
can one prove that?

The relevant Hilbert space is not the subspace of [itex]C^2[/itex] itself (which is not complete with respect to the [itex]L^2[/itex] norm anyway), but the completion of that subspace with respect to the [itex]L^2[/itex] norm.
 
But how can we describe that completion?
 
hellofolks said:
But how can we describe that completion?

As the set of equivalence classes of square-integrable but not necessarily continuous functions satisfying the given boundary conditions under the equivalence relation [itex]{\sim}[/itex], where [itex]f \sim g[/itex] if and only if the set [itex]\{ x : f(x) \neq g(x)\}[/itex] has measure zero. This construction is necessary to ensure that [itex]\left(\int f^2\,\mathrm{d}x\right)^{1/2}[/itex] remains a norm, since two functions which differ on a set of measure zero have the same integral. It also ensures that no two continuous functions are in the same equivalence class, since if two continuous functions differ at a point then they must differ on an open neighbourhood of that point, and open neighbourhoods have strictly positive measure.
 
The completion detail is usually not described in textbooks. Do you have any idea why?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K