Other Don’t have a high enough IQ for physics so I want to give up

  • Thread starter Thread starter electronquark
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An undergraduate physics student expresses feelings of inadequacy due to perceived low IQ scores (125-130) compared to the average IQ of elite institutions (140-150). They believe this gap indicates a lack of cognitive ability necessary for success in top-tier PhD programs, particularly in theoretical physics. The discussion challenges the validity of online IQ tests and the relevance of IQ in admissions processes, suggesting that many students at prestigious schools are not necessarily geniuses. It emphasizes the importance of perseverance and self-belief, urging the student not to abandon their aspirations. The conversation highlights the subjective nature of intelligence and the potential for growth beyond perceived limitations.
electronquark
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently an undergraduate student at an average school in physics and the best student and am targeting some elite top tier PhD programs. recently did many online IQ tests and the result was 125-130 however the average IQ at top colleges is 140-150 for any major

https://iqtest.net/rankings/average-iq-by-university


For physics likely 150-160 due to it being more challenging yes literally everyone at MIT doing physics is a genius. My IQ is effectively 60-70 at these colleges among the students there if we set 100 as average so borderline mentally handicapped and I want to give up my dreams even I get admission due to lacking the neural architecture and cognitive faculties to succeed. I always wanted to be a theorist but my IQ isn’t high enough and nothing will ever make up for missing cognitive faculties. Even if I get admission I will likely be the worst in the class and theres no improvement due to not having the neural architecture. I will go from the best student at my school to the worst in a top school. I am convinced theory requires a special mind and IQ which most people don’t possess
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think everything in your post (after the first sentence) is incorrect.

Here's what I know:
  • Online IQ tests are meaningless
  • Those university averages are made up numbers, because IQ tests are not part of the admissions process, and very few people have ever taken a real IQ test. The given numbers may have been inferred by SAT scores but that's questionable method at best.
  • *Everyone* at MIT doing physics is *not* a genius. I have worked with quite a few MIT grads.
  • "Neural architecture" -- what is that?
  • If you think you're going to be at the bottom of your class, guess what ...
EDIT: my point is, please don't give up on yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes gwnorth, PeterDonis, DaveE and 1 other person
In addition to @gmax137, what you're describing is similar to drivers on a highway stuck in traffic. They feel their lane is moving slowly, whereas neighboring lanes are moving forward faster, and so they switch, only to discover that now the new lane is not moving while others are.

In psychology, it's known as a perception illusion because you are using others as a guide to determine your position among others. What you don't see is that many of them have the same perceptual illusion and are struggling to project a superior image.

---

I had a young friend who went to college to major in computer science. She was blown away by how the other students seemed to know stuff that she didn't. One knew about JavaScript and web pages, another about Java programming or assembler, you name it. She came in with a solid academic record and was learning things as fast as they were taught, but still felt she was behind. She considered switching econ.

I counseled her against switching midstream and had to explain to her that male students are constantly worrying about their image and act in extremely competitive ways to make people think they are smart. It's a lot like the machismo that surrounded hot rods, where teens would add things to their car to supercharge it and make others jealous.

---

My advice to you is to ignore these external distractions and continue on your path until you realize that you aren't behind. Your grades will serve as proof of your skills, and you might even be ahead of the crowd, putting you in line for better job offers.

You can go out there and do your best.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes gwnorth
Closing this thread as we have exhausted the topic.

Thank you, @gmax137, for your insightful answer. Thanks also go to @electronquark for asking it.

This is a very real problem for college students, especially since they come from a high school environment where students are in class by tradition and mandate, but are now entering a setting where their peers are just as motivated as they are, face the same insecurities, and use the same tactics to appear superior.

Don't let your fears of failure ruin a promising career. Study hard, work with your peers, talk with your professors, and you'll get through this.

Jedi

---

PS: I am currently going through this as a CS graduate student in Texas, retired but with extensive experience, yet I find it challenging to learn all the new material.

After completing the required 30 credit hours of instruction, I will prepare for the qualifying exam and undertake the self-directed tasks of writing code, testing it in various ways, and synthesizing my results into a 150-page thesis that I will then defend before a committee of experienced professors and the broader academic community.

For some students, this may be too much, but my project-oriented work, training, and experience will get me through. The instructor has reminded us that our thesis advisor is a trusted and critical resource that we shouldn't hesitate to call upon when we hit a snag. We should also network and collaborate with our fellow CS graduates to learn how they have overcome obstacles in their research.

In the final stage, I will need to write a paper, go through the peer review process, and then move on to publication to share my discovery, no matter how small it may seem to the world.

My first course, titled Introduction to CompSci PhD Research, emphasizes that journey, preparing us for what lies ahead over the next three to four years.

Our teacher has recommended the book by Justin Zobel entitled: Writing for Computer Science

https://www.amazon.com/Writing-Computer-Science-Justin-Zobel/dp/1447166388?tag=pfamazon01-20

Jedi
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.

Similar threads

Back
Top