Other Don’t have a high enough IQ for physics so I want to give up

  • Thread starter Thread starter electronquark
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An undergraduate physics student expresses feelings of inadequacy due to perceived low IQ scores (125-130) compared to the average IQ of elite institutions (140-150). They believe this gap indicates a lack of cognitive ability necessary for success in top-tier PhD programs, particularly in theoretical physics. The discussion challenges the validity of online IQ tests and the relevance of IQ in admissions processes, suggesting that many students at prestigious schools are not necessarily geniuses. It emphasizes the importance of perseverance and self-belief, urging the student not to abandon their aspirations. The conversation highlights the subjective nature of intelligence and the potential for growth beyond perceived limitations.
electronquark
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently an undergraduate student at an average school in physics and the best student and am targeting some elite top tier PhD programs. recently did many online IQ tests and the result was 125-130 however the average IQ at top colleges is 140-150 for any major

https://iqtest.net/rankings/average-iq-by-university


For physics likely 150-160 due to it being more challenging yes literally everyone at MIT doing physics is a genius. My IQ is effectively 60-70 at these colleges among the students there if we set 100 as average so borderline mentally handicapped and I want to give up my dreams even I get admission due to lacking the neural architecture and cognitive faculties to succeed. I always wanted to be a theorist but my IQ isn’t high enough and nothing will ever make up for missing cognitive faculties. Even if I get admission I will likely be the worst in the class and theres no improvement due to not having the neural architecture. I will go from the best student at my school to the worst in a top school. I am convinced theory requires a special mind and IQ which most people don’t possess
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think everything in your post (after the first sentence) is incorrect.

Here's what I know:
  • Online IQ tests are meaningless
  • Those university averages are made up numbers, because IQ tests are not part of the admissions process, and very few people have ever taken a real IQ test. The given numbers may have been inferred by SAT scores but that's questionable method at best.
  • *Everyone* at MIT doing physics is *not* a genius. I have worked with quite a few MIT grads.
  • "Neural architecture" -- what is that?
  • If you think you're going to be at the bottom of your class, guess what ...
EDIT: my point is, please don't give up on yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis, DaveE and berkeman
Thread is closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
In addition to @gmax137, what you're describing is similar to drivers on a highway stuck in traffic. They feel their lane is moving slowly, whereas neighboring lanes are moving forward faster, and so they switch, only to discover that now the new lane is not moving while others are.

In psychology, it's known as a perception illusion because you are using others as a guide to determine your position among others. What you don't see is that many of them have the same perceptual illusion and are struggling to project a superior image.

---

I had a young friend who went to college to major in computer science. She was blown away by how the other students seemed to know stuff that she didn't. One knew about JavaScript and web pages, another about Java programming or assembler, you name it. She came in with a solid academic record and was learning things as fast as they were taught, but still felt she was behind. She considered switching econ.

I counseled her against switching midstream and had to explain to her that male students are constantly worrying about their image and act in extremely competitive ways to make people think they are smart. It's a lot like the machismo that surrounded hot rods, where teens would add things to their car to supercharge it and make others jealous.

---

My advice to you is to ignore these external distractions and continue on your path until you realize that you aren't behind. Your grades will serve as proof of your skills, and you might even be ahead of the crowd, putting you in line for better job offers.

You can go out there and do your best.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top