Doppler Effect and the Expanding Universe

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter prochatz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Doppler effect as it relates to the observation of light from moving objects, specifically in the context of galaxies and the expanding universe. Participants explore the implications of the Doppler effect for both everyday examples, like ambulances, and astronomical phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the Doppler effect causes a blue shift when objects approach and a red shift when they recede, as seen in galaxies and stars.
  • Others argue that the speeds of everyday objects, like ambulances, are too slow relative to the speed of light to observe a noticeable Doppler shift in their light.
  • There is a question about whether the speeds of galaxies approach the speed of light, with some stating that while galaxy motion is generally slow, the expansion of space causes distant galaxies to recede at significant fractions of the speed of light.
  • Some participants express confusion about the possibility of objects exceeding the speed of light, suggesting that it may be related to the stretching of space rather than the objects themselves moving faster than light.
  • One participant mentions that detection devices have sensitivity limits, which may affect the observation of the Doppler effect.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of special relativity in the context of an expanding universe, with some suggesting that the conclusions of special relativity may not apply in such scenarios.
  • Another participant references external sources to support claims about redshift and recession velocities, indicating that certain astronomical objects can appear to recede faster than light due to the expansion of spacetime.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the Doppler effect to everyday scenarios versus astronomical contexts. There is no consensus on the implications of the expansion of space and its relationship to the speed of light, with multiple competing views remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on assumptions about the nature of light, speed, and the expansion of space, which are not universally accepted or proven. The discussion includes references to external sources that may not be agreed upon by all participants.

prochatz
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I've recently read that when a galaxy or star(if I'm right) comes closer to earth, its spectrum shifts to blue. Correspondingly, when it travels away from Earth its spectrum shifts to red. The cause of the shift is Doppler effect.

My question: Why don't we observe doppler effect when an ambulance drives away? If the light on top of the ambulance was blue, shouldn't we expect any redshift? Using the same thoughts, why don't we observe blueshift on the front lights of a truck which comes close to us?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
They are going much too slow wrt the speed of light to notice the difference. You do notice the difference in their sirens, though.
 
Last edited:
Does the speed of galaxies or stars approach the speed of light?
 
Very distant galaxies move (relative to us) at a significant fraction of the speed of light.
 
prochatz said:
Does the speed of galaxies or stars approach the speed of light?

The motion of galaxies through space seldom exceeds a few percent of the speed of light, and even then, only in dense clusters. However, the expansion of space itself causes very distant galaxies to recede from us at speeds near or even greater than the speed of light.
 
Thank you very much
 
russ_watters said:
They are going much to slow wrt the speed of light to notice the difference. You do notice the difference in their siresn, though.

Does Doppler effect occur after crossing a specific barrier?
 
SpaceTiger said:
The motion of galaxies through space seldom exceeds a few percent of the speed of light, and even then, only in dense clusters. However, the expansion of space itself causes very distant galaxies to recede from us at speeds near or even greater than the speed of light.


Is it possible anything can travel faster than the speed of light - that too matter? Or is it with respect to us? Even if it is with respect to us, is it possible for something to move faster than the speed of light or equal to it?
 
prochatz said:
Does Doppler effect occur after crossing a specific barrier?
Not really, but every detection device, including your eyes, has a certan sensitivity associated with it. If the effect is weaker than the sensitivity of your device, you won't detect it.
 
  • #10
MindRafter said:
Is it possible anything can travel faster than the speed of light - that too matter? Or is it with respect to us? Even if it is with respect to us, is it possible for something to move faster than the speed of light or equal to it?


Its not so much that they are traveling faster than the speed of light, rather that space is stretching. Special relativity and its conclusions only make sense in flat, static space-time. When space starts stretching, things get more complicated.
 
  • #11
SpaceTiger said:
The motion of galaxies through space seldom exceeds a few percent of the speed of light, and even then, only in dense clusters. However, the expansion of space itself causes very distant galaxies to recede from us at speeds near or even greater than the speed of light.

I can't understand how it is possible for an object to exceed or at least approach the speed of light. We can't even prove that space expands. Anyway, we should open another topic for this conversation.
 
  • #12
prochatz said:
I can't understand how it is possible for an object to exceed
or at least approach the speed of light. We can't even prove that space expands.

We can't 'prove' anything about the universe.

We can show that the data is quite well explained if we accept that space is stretching. Or at least, well enough explained to accept it as a provisional hypothesis. I reiterate:

franznietzsche said:
Its not so much that they are traveling faster than the speed of light, rather that space is stretching. Special relativity and its conclusions only make sense in flat, static space-time. When space starts stretching, things get more complicated.
 
  • #13
Franznietsche is right. From Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift

... v > c is possible for objects dominated by cosmological redshift because the spacetime which separates the objects (eg a quasar from the Earth) is expanding and spacetime is described by general relativity...

Here´s some more on this topic from the UCLA:

www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/doppler.htm

...Thus for the largest known redshift of z=6.3, the recession velocity is not 6.3*c = 1,890,000 km/sec. It is also not the 285,254 km/sec given by the special relativistic Doppler formula 1+z = sqrt((1+v/c)/(1-v/c)). The actual recession velocity for this object depends on the cosmological parameters, but for an OmegaM=0.3 vacuum-dominated flat model the velocity is 585,611 km/sec. This is faster than light...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K