Dot product of 4-force and 4-velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical derivation of the relationship between 4-force and 4-velocity, specifically addressing the equation \(\frac{\mathrm{d} \gamma}{\mathrm{d} t} = \frac{\gamma^3}{c^2} \, \vec{a} \cdot \vec{v}\). Participants clarify the distinction between the magnitudes of 3-velocity \(\vec{v}\) and 3-acceleration \(\vec{a}\) and their respective dot products. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying derivatives in the context of relativistic physics, particularly in relation to the Minkowski dot product. Key corrections were made regarding the application of vector calculus in the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-vectors and their notation in physics
  • Familiarity with Minkowski and Euclidean dot products
  • Knowledge of relativistic equations, specifically Einstein's mass-energy equivalence
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation of vector functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Minkowski dot product in detail
  • Explore the implications of the Lorentz factor \(\gamma\) in relativistic mechanics
  • Learn about the relationship between force, acceleration, and velocity in the context of special relativity
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of 3-vectors and their applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of relativistic mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

Rasalhague
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
2
In what follows, I'll use bold for 4-vectors and an arrow over a letter to denote a 3-vector. I'll use a dot both for the Minkowski dot product and the Euclidean one, and multiplication of real numbers; the meaning in each case should be clear from the symbols on either side. \vec{v} and \vec{a} are 3-veclocity and 3-acceleration. The same letters without the arrow are their magnitudes.

I've been working through the E=mc^2 derivation at the Shady Crypt Observatory site, which someone posted in a recent thread. I've got up to the detour establishing that \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{U} = 0, equation 18. I'm with them for the first three lines of the derivation that follows this equation, but I don't yet see how

\frac{\mathrm{d} \gamma}{\mathrm{d} t} = \frac{\gamma^3}{c^2} \, \vec{a} \cdot \vec{v}.

I get

\frac{\mathrm{d} \gamma}{\mathrm{d} t} = \frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}\left ( \left [ 1-\left ( \frac{v}{c} \right )^2 \right ]^{1/2} \right )

=-\left [ 1-\left ( \frac{v}{c} \right )^2 \right ]^{-3/2}\cdot\left ( \frac{-2v}{c} \right )\cdot\frac{1}{c}\cdot a

=\frac{2av}{c^2\left [ 1-\left ( \frac{v}{c} \right )^2 \right ]^{3/2}} = \frac{2av \gamma^3}{c^2}=\frac{2av\gamma}{c^2-v^2}.

But \vec{a} \cdot \vec{v} = a \, v\, \cos{\theta} and, whatever the angle, \cos{\theta} \neq 2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rasalhague said:
In what follows, I'll use bold for 4-vectors and an arrow over a letter to denote a 3-vector. I'll use a dot both for the Minkowski dot product and the Euclidean one, and multiplication of real numbers; the meaning in each case should be clear from the symbols on either side. \vec{v} and \vec{a} are 3-veclocity and 3-acceleration. The same letters without the arrow are their magnitudes.

I've been working through the E=mc^2 derivation at the Shady Crypt Observatory site, which someone posted in a recent thread. I've got up to the detour establishing that \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{U} = 0, equation 18. I'm with them for the first three lines of the derivation that follows this equation, but I don't yet see how

\frac{\mathrm{d} \gamma}{\mathrm{d} t} = \frac{\gamma^3}{c^2} \, \vec{a} \cdot \vec{v}.

I get

\frac{\mathrm{d} \gamma}{\mathrm{d} t} = \frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} t}\left ( \left [ 1-\left ( \frac{v}{c} \right )^2 \right ]^{1/2} \right )

=-\left [ 1-\left ( \frac{v}{c} \right )^2 \right ]^{-3/2}\cdot\left ( \frac{-2v}{c} \right )\cdot\frac{1}{c}\cdot a

=\frac{2av}{c^2\left [ 1-\left ( \frac{v}{c} \right )^2 \right ]^{3/2}} = \frac{2av \gamma^3}{c^2}=\frac{2av\gamma}{c^2-v^2}.

But \vec{a} \cdot \vec{v} = a \, v\, \cos{\theta} and, whatever the angle, \cos{\theta} \neq 2.

You forgot to put a 2 in the denominator of the derivative of \gamma.

AB
 
Ah, yes, so I did. Thanks, Altabeh. But how do we know that acceleration due to this arbitrary force will be in the same direction as the velocity of the object experiencing the force?
 
In your argument you have taken

a = \frac{d|\vec{v}|}{dt}​

when in fact it is

a = \left|\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}\right|​

To get the result you want, differentiate

v^2 = \vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}​
 
Rasalhague said:
Ah, yes, so I did. Thanks, Altabeh. But how do we know that acceleration due to this arbitrary force will be in the same direction as the velocity of the object experiencing the force?

We don't need to know how a and v vectors are directed if there is a force acting on an object! Why are you asking this?

AB
 
Got it! Thanks, DrGreg.

Altabeh said:
We don't need to know how a and v vectors are directed if there is a force acting on an object! Why are you asking this?

I see that now. I asked because I thought they'd just substituted \vec{a}\cdot \vec{v} for av. But as DrGreg pointed out,

\frac{\mathrm{d}v}{\mathrm{d}t}=\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\left(\vec{v}\cdot \vec{v}\right)^{1/2}=\frac{1}{2v} \left(\frac{\mathrm{d}\vec{v}}{\mathrm{d}t} \cdot \vec{v} + \vec{v} \cdot \frac{\mathrm{d}\vec{v}}{\mathrm{d}t} \right)

is not the same thing as

\vec{a} = \frac{\mathrm{d}\vec{v}}{\mathrm{d}t}.

So

\frac{\mathrm{d}\gamma}{\mathrm{d}t}=\frac{\vec{a}\cdot \vec{v}}{c^2}\gamma^3.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K