MHB Double-Check My Problem Solving | Correct Reasoning Verification

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert Einstein1
  • Start date Start date
Albert Einstein1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am not entirely sure if I solved this problem correctly. Please let me know if my reasoning is flawed. Thank you and I appreciate your help greatly.
 

Attachments

  • 0EC6D101-ED4B-4D59-9103-D8F298F7F027.jpeg
    0EC6D101-ED4B-4D59-9103-D8F298F7F027.jpeg
    42 KB · Views: 119
  • 779A43FE-A23E-449E-9B66-A4FCFD72DE41.jpeg
    779A43FE-A23E-449E-9B66-A4FCFD72DE41.jpeg
    279.4 KB · Views: 113
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The function is continuous, just substitute x = 0...
 
On second thought, I didn't read the question properly... Please disregard my previous post.
 
The function IS continuous at x=0 but you need to show that $\lim_{x\to 0} f(x)= 1$ to show THAT so continuity cannot be used to do this exercise.

Albert, you state that $-1\le x^2- 2\le 1$. That is the same as $1\le x^2\le 3$. If x is close to 0 that is NOT true! You also have $\lim_{x\to 0} -x^2= 1$ and $\lim_{x\to 0} x^2= 1$. Those are certainly not true! Did you mean "= 0"?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top