Double Double Slit Experiment -- Question about Variations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of placing two double slits at a distance from each other in a double-slit experiment and the resulting interference patterns. Participants confirm that while various experiments have been conducted, the expected outcome is that if the second slits are positioned where destructive interference occurs, the detector would register minimal to no light. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding spatial filtering and its effects on diffraction patterns, emphasizing that intuition may not align with actual experimental results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double-slit experiments
  • Familiarity with interference patterns and diffraction
  • Knowledge of spatial filtering techniques
  • Basic principles of photon behavior in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research spatial filtering in optics
  • Explore advanced concepts in quantum interference
  • Study the mathematical calculations behind diffraction patterns
  • Investigate experimental setups for double-slit variations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and students interested in quantum mechanics and experimental physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those exploring advanced interference phenomena.

Myslius
Messages
124
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
Double Double Slit Experiment
emitter -> double slit -> double slit -> detector.

Was an experiment ever made where two double slits are placed at some distance between each other? What kind of interference pattern would you get? What would happen if second slits were placed at the position where there is destructive interference pattern, would you see no light at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

You should know by now that the standard PF answer is: what do you think?

But that would be corny. So: yes, of course folks have experimented themselves silly with all kinds of variations. You seem to think of narrow double slits at small distance apart wrt the features of the diffraction pattern. There isn't much fun with that: dark remains dark and so on. Much more excitement when playing on a bigger scale: removing entire peaks from the diffraction pattern for example. Google 'spatial filtering' to find out more.

## \ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
What i think, the intuition says that detector should not detect any (very little) intensity. Yet, intuition might be wrong here. In the case of double polarisation filters intensity doesn't decrease if filters are aligned. Would love to see data from experimental setup. Was looking around, didn't find any papers, maybe i missed something.
 
Myslius said:
What i think, the intuition says that detector should not detect any (very little) intensity. Yet, intuition might be wrong here. In the case of double polarisation filters intensity doesn't decrease if filters are aligned. Would love to see data from experimental setup. Was looking around, didn't find any papers, maybe i missed something.
No papers, it's all straightforward calculation. Don't see the similarity with polarization filters.

Intuition doesn't come in: no photons ##\rightarrow## dark ! ... slits or no slits.

## \ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
509
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K