Trollfaz
- 144
- 16
In the double slit experiment does the screen and the cardboard with the slits count as an observer since the electron interacted with them?
The discussion revolves around the role of observation in the double slit experiment, specifically whether the screen and the slits act as observers due to their interaction with electrons. Participants explore the implications of these interactions on the behavior of electrons and the nature of measurement in quantum mechanics.
Participants express differing views on the nature of observation and measurement in the double slit experiment, with no consensus reached on whether the screen and slits can be classified as observers.
The discussion highlights the complexity of defining observation in quantum mechanics, with assumptions about the nature of interactions and the definitions of measurement remaining unresolved.
When an electron interacts with the screen to leave a dot at some point, that's an observation of the position of the electron so you could say that the screen has observed the position of the electron at the moment it reaches the screen. Note the screen+electron system has been irreversibly changed by this interaction.Trollfaz said:In the double slit experiment does the screen and the cardboard with the slits count as an observer since the electron interacted with them?
The barrier and the screen are completely different objects with completely different construction. Why would we not expect them to interact differently with nearby electrons? Indeed, we've deliberately designed them to interact differently - we've designed the screen to absorb every electron that reaches it, and we've designed the barrier to interact as little as possible with the electrons passing through the slits.Trollfaz said:Then why is the detector used able to cause the electron to choose which slit to go through but not the screen?