Doubt on Fatigue Strength S-N diagrams

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Abhishekdas
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
A standard way of plotting an S-N (fatigue strength vs no of cycles) graph is to start off by taking a value of Sm (for N=1000) cycles and joining it to the point depicting Se(Endurance Limit). Now we commonly take Sm= 0.9Sut for steels. Now I was wandering, before you actually get to use the component for 1000 cyces at 0.9 Sut the component will yield at around 0.5Sut(before you reach Sm), as Sy(steel)≈.5Sut. SO should yielding be the cause of failure for values of stress rather than fatigue?
Thank you in anticipation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abhishekdas: Yes, you are correct. I.e., if the allowable tensile stress (Sta) based on tensile yield strength (Sta = Sy/FSy) is less than the fatigue strength (Sn), then Sta governs over Sn, in which case you would use Sta, where FSy = yield factor of safety.