Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Downfield isnt low field ... or is it?

  1. Apr 16, 2016 #1
    In CW or FT pmr, as chemical shift increases, why do we say "downfield" implying a lower magnetic field strength, when deshielded protons need a higher flip energy requiring a higher magnetic field strength and / or higher radio frequency radiation? Am I having a senior moment - apologies if so ...
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 16, 2016 #2

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

  4. Apr 17, 2016 #3
    No - it's a different question. I understand that the energy gap increases with deshielding : my query is I am missing the point as to why we say downfield implying a weaker field if the larger gap needs a stronger applied field?!
     
  5. Apr 18, 2016 #4

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

  6. Apr 18, 2016 #5
    Thanks Dr Du yes this makes more sense. I hope there are others who would agree with this to provide confirmation / reassurance!
     
  7. Apr 18, 2016 #6
    Upfield/downfield is a relic of the CW NMR era, and should be banished into the abyss when it comes to discussing NMR nowadays. The IUPAC even agrees. It's just confusing, as it's juxtaposed with the shielding/deshielding discussion, which is the important thing to be clear about when discussing chemical shifts.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Downfield isnt low field ... or is it?
  1. Fluid with low oiliness (Replies: 15)

Loading...