Biology Draw the genetic cross for the given pedigree

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tasha Clifford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cross
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the difficulty of creating a genetic cross diagram based on a provided pedigree, where black shading indicates affected individuals. The original poster expresses frustration after attempting multiple combinations without success. Participants request to see the poster's attempts to identify errors and suggest linking to correctly worked examples for better guidance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the pedigree's implications for offspring inheritance patterns. Assistance is sought to clarify the genetic relationships and accurately depict the cross diagram.
Tasha Clifford
Messages
19
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Given the following pedigree and that Black shading implies sick individual

Draw a suitable cross diagram for the first and second generation offsprings
Relevant Equations
None
765DF0AD-AE43-451C-B433-9A5A617952F6.jpeg


I have tried every possible combination to come up with the cross diagram to no avail
Your help is needed please😩😩😩
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tasha Clifford said:
Homework Statement:: Given the following pedigree and that Black shading implies sick individual

Draw a suitable cross diagram for the first and second generation offsprings
Relevant Equations:: None

I have tried every possible combination
That's amazing! Could you please show us that work, and tell us why each try was probably wrong? Thanks.

Also, if you could link to some correctly worked examples of this type of question, that would help us in replying. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top