Chemistry Draw the mechanism of the reactions of steps 1 and 2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on drawing the full mechanism for reactions in steps 1 and 2, specifically involving Tetramethylguanidine (TMG) and the monomethoxytrityl (MMT) protecting group. Participants emphasize the importance of accurately depicting which protecting groups are removed and which remain in the diagrams. A user expresses uncertainty about their initial approach but receives feedback indicating that their understanding is mostly correct, with minor errors to address. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in illustrating chemical mechanisms to ensure accurate representation of the reactions. Overall, the thread serves as a collaborative effort to refine the understanding of reaction mechanisms in organic chemistry.
physicisttobe
Messages
56
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
Tetramethylguanidine/monomethoxytrityl
Relevant Equations
...
Hi everyone!

There is a task that I can't solve. Can you explain me how I have to draw the full mechanism?

Draw the mechanism of the reactions of step 1 and 2. Indicate the product before step
3. (in step 2 also TMG =Tetramethylguanidine is given and instead of the
protecting group DMT was given MMT =monomethoxytrityl).
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (33).png
    Screenshot (33).png
    16.3 KB · Views: 163
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show some work before we can help you. Maybe start by identifying which reagent deprotects which functional group.
 
Oh yes, next time i will post all my approaches. I was a little uncertain, whether the mechanism is correct. Therefore, I did not upload anything.
But my approach looks like this. I hope it‘s correct:
55A6DE7F-8A7B-49FD-8B11-D134B8CDA8BB.jpeg
 
It looks like you have the idea. A couple of minor things: make sure the protecting groups you aren’t removing stay on the diagrams, and make sure the protecting groups you’ve already removed don’t (for instance, in the mechanism for step 2, you still have the DMT group protecting the sugar OH, which you just showed was removed in step 1). There’s one or two other little errors of that nature, but overall, the mechanism looks pretty good.
 
  • Like
Likes physicisttobe
All right, thanks a lot!!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top