In Ryder's text, he defines the dual tensor as the anti-symmetric [tex] \tilde F^{\nu \mu} = \epsilon^{\nu \mu \alpha \beta} F_{\alpha \beta}[/tex]. Later he plops down the complex scalar field Lagrangian as(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] L = (D_\mu \phi)(D^\mu \phi *) - m^2 \phi * \phi - \frac{1}{4} F^{\nu \mu}F_{\nu \mu}[/tex]

where [tex] D_\mu[/tex] is the covariant derivative. So the thing i was wondering is why can't you have terms like [tex] \tilde F^{\nu \mu} \tilde F_{\nu \mu}[/tex]? I did the work to figure out why you can't have terms like [tex] F^{\nu \mu} \tilde F_{\nu \mu}[/tex], but I just wanted to see what happens to the scalar term using two dual tensors.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dual-tensors not in Lagrangian

Loading...

Similar Threads - Dual tensors Lagrangian | Date |
---|---|

B Dual meaning of "measurement" in QM | Oct 20, 2017 |

I I can determine the photon path in delayed erasure | Dec 23, 2016 |

Dual tensors in Lagrangian | May 26, 2014 |

Self-dual and Anti Self-dual antisymmetric tensor | Nov 24, 2012 |

Dual of Maxwell tensor as gauge curvature | Apr 26, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**