# lagrangian Definition and Topics - 109 Discussions

Introduced by the Italian-French mathematician and astronomer Joseph-Louis Lagrange in 1788, Lagrangian mechanics is a formulation of classical mechanics and is founded on the stationary action principle.
Lagrangian mechanics defines a mechanical system to be a pair

(
M
,
L
)

{\displaystyle (M,L)}
of a configuration space

M

{\displaystyle M}
and a smooth function

L
=
L
(
q
,
v
,
t
)

{\displaystyle L=L(q,v,t)}
called Lagrangian. By convention,

L
=
T

V
,

{\displaystyle L=T-V,}
where

T

{\displaystyle T}
and

V

{\displaystyle V}
are the kinetic and potential energy of the system, respectively. Here

q

M
,

{\displaystyle q\in M,}
and

v

{\displaystyle v}
is the velocity vector at

q

{\displaystyle q}

(
v

{\displaystyle (v}
is tangential to

M
)
.

{\displaystyle M).}
(For those familiar with tangent bundles,

L
:
T
M
×

R

t

R

,

{\displaystyle L:TM\times \mathbb {R} _{t}\to \mathbb {R} ,}
and

v

T

q

M
)
.

{\displaystyle v\in T_{q}M).}

Given the time instants

t

1

{\displaystyle t_{1}}
and

t

2

,

{\displaystyle t_{2},}
Lagrangian mechanics postulates that a smooth path

x

0

:
[

t

1

,

t

2

]

M

{\displaystyle x_{0}:[t_{1},t_{2}]\to M}
describes the time evolution of the given system if and only if

x

0

{\displaystyle x_{0}}
is a stationary point of the action functional

S

[
x
]

=

def

t

1

t

2

L
(
x
(
t
)
,

x
˙

(
t
)
,
t
)

d
t
.

{\displaystyle {\cal {S}}[x]\,{\stackrel {\text{def}}{=}}\,\int _{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}L(x(t),{\dot {x}}(t),t)\,dt.}
If

M

{\displaystyle M}
is an open subset of

R

n

{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
and

t

1

,

{\displaystyle t_{1},}

t

2

{\displaystyle t_{2}}
are finite, then the smooth path

x

0

{\displaystyle x_{0}}
is a stationary point of

S

{\displaystyle {\cal {S}}}
if all its directional derivatives at

x

0

{\displaystyle x_{0}}
vanish, i.e., for every smooth

δ
:
[

t

1

,

t

2

]

R

n

,

{\displaystyle \delta :[t_{1},t_{2}]\to \mathbb {R} ^{n},}

δ

S

=

def

d

d
ε

|

ε
=
0

S

[

x

0

+
ε
δ

]

=
0.

{\displaystyle \delta {\cal {S}}\ {\stackrel {\text{def}}{=}}\ {\frac {d}{d\varepsilon }}{\Biggl |}_{\varepsilon =0}{\cal {S}}\left[x_{0}+\varepsilon \delta \right]=0.}
The function

δ
(
t
)

{\displaystyle \delta (t)}
on the right-hand side is called perturbation or virtual displacement. The directional derivative

δ

S

{\displaystyle \delta {\cal {S}}}
on the left is known as variation in physics and Gateaux derivative in Mathematics.
Lagrangian mechanics has been extended to allow for non-conservative forces.

View More On Wikipedia.org
1. ### Optimization: How to find the dual problem?

Hi, I am working on the following optimization problem, and am confused how to apply the Lagrangian in the following scenario: Question: Let us look at the following problem \min_{x \in \mathbb{R}_{+} ^{n}} \sum_{j=1}^{m} x_j log(x_j) \text{subject to} A \vec{x} \leq b \rightarrow A\vec{x}...

25. ### I Missing exponent in "Theoretical Minimum"?

In "The Theoretical Minimum" (the one on classical mechanics), on page 218, the authors write a Lagrangian $$L=\frac m 2 (\dot r^2 +r^2\dot \theta ^2)+\frac {GMm} r$$ They then apply the Euler-Lagrange equation ##\frac d {dt}\frac {dL} {d\dot r}=\frac {dL} {dr}## (I know there should be...
26. ### I Interpreting SM Lagrangian "differential particle" terms

The Standard Model Lagrangian contains terms like these: ##-\partial_\mu \phi^+ \partial_\mu\phi^-## ##-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\nu Z^0_\mu\partial_\nu Z^0_\mu## ##-igc_w\partial_\nu Z^0(W^+_\mu W^-_\nu-W^+_\nu W^-_\mu)## How should one interpret the "derivative particle fields" like...
27. ### Is it possible to integrate acceleration?

Alright so I was just messing around with Lagrangian equation, I just learned about it, and I had gotten to this equation of motion: Mg*sin{α} - 1.5m*x(double dot)=0 I am trying to get velocity, and my first thought was to integrate with dt, but I didn't know how to. And I'm not even sure it's...
28. ### I The Lagrangian and the second derivative?

Why Lagrangian not depend of higher derivatives of generalised coordinates ?
29. ### A Lagrangian vs pseudo-Lagrangian vs Eulerian

I'm reading up a series of papers on hydrodynamical simulations for galaxies and cosmology. They keep mentioning things like "Lagrangian" or "pseudo-lagrangian" or "Eulerian". I tried looking it up on the internet, but the answers are either too broad and could mean a huge number of things in...
30. ### Question about a derivation: velocity and position

I started studying Lagrangian mechanics, and the movement equation is like this: d/dt (d/dz') L - d/dz L = 0 if the movement is on the z axis. Now the problem is, let's say L = M(z')2/2 - Mgz. How do we derivate an expression depending of z with respect to z' and also , an expression depending...