[E&M] Concentrical metalic spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xsnac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Spheres
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
14 replies · 2K views
Xsnac
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement

I two concentric metalical spheres r1 =/= r2.
What to do to have:
a) potential energy = 0 and electric charge =/= 0
b) potential energy =/= 0 and electric charge =0.

In eighter one of the spheres.

Relevant equations
Gauss law.

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
If I charge the outside sphere, I will have potential energy = 0 on it and electric charge =/= 0.

b)
I tought If I charge the one inside with Q, I will have a potential =/= 0 on the bigger sphere and 0 charge.

Is this correct? The problem does not give correct answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do any of the spheres have an initial charge on them? And are you at a point in between the two spheres?
 
I'm outside and I can charge eighter the bigger or the smaller or both of them. I have to have the specs from eighter a) or b) on 1 of them.
 
Well, when you have a net positive or negative charge the potential will approach zero only at infinity (unless otherwise specified such as the ground on a circuit). If you charge the outside sphere, why would potential energy be zero on it? May you show us what equation you are using for electric potential energy?
 
Last edited:
Xsnac said:
Homework Statement

I two concentric metallic spheres r1 =/= r2.
What to do to have:
a) potential energy = 0 and electric charge =/= 0
b) potential energy =/= 0 and electric charge =0.

In either one of the spheres.

Relevant equations
Gauss law.

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
If I charge the outside sphere, I will have potential energy = 0 on it and electric charge =/= 0.

b)
I thought If I charge the one inside with Q, I will have a potential =/= 0 on the bigger sphere and 0 charge.

Is this correct? The problem does not give correct answer.
Electric potential

or

Potential energy stored in the system?
 
SammyS said:
Electric potential

or

Potential energy stored in the system?
Electric potential
 
Xsnac said:
Electric potential
That makes more sense. Electric potential is different from electrical potential energy.
So, what equation do you have for finding the electric potential at a given distance from a uniformly charged sphere?
 
haruspex said:
That makes more sense. Electric potential is different from electrical potential energy.
So, what equation do you have for finding the electric potential at a given distance from a uniformly charged sphere?
k * q1 / r ( where K is 1/4 pi epsilon )
 
SammyS said:
What does "r" represent ?
the distance from where the electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential.
 
haruspex said:
No. Check your course notes.
that's what I have written in the manual. Electric potential V = Q/(4*pi*epsilon) * 1/r. Should I upload a picture of the manual?
 
then I'm lost. what's the definition? I always tought it is the distance between the place where electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential..
 
Xsnac said:
then I'm lost. what's the definition? I always tought it is the distance between the place where electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential..
The equation you quoted can be applied in two contexts.
In the most basic one it gives the potential at distance r caused by a point charge Q, if taking the potential at infinity to be zero.
It also works if the charge is spread uniformly over a spherical shell or through a solid sphere. In these cases, r is the distance from the centre of the sphere, and the equation only works if r is greater than the radius of the sphere.