[E&M] Concentrical metalic spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xsnac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Spheres
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of electric potential and potential energy in the context of two concentric metallic spheres with different radii. The original poster presents two scenarios involving potential energy and electric charge, seeking clarification on the conditions under which these can be achieved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of charging either the inner or outer sphere and question the relationship between electric potential and potential energy. There is a focus on understanding the definitions and equations related to electric potential, particularly in relation to uniformly charged spheres.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning assumptions about electric potential and potential energy, with some providing equations and definitions. There is a recognition of differing interpretations regarding the variable "r" in the context of electric potential calculations. The discussion is ongoing, with no clear consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding initial charges on the spheres and the reference point for electric potential. The problem does not provide explicit answers, leading to varied interpretations among participants.

Xsnac
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement

I two concentric metalical spheres r1 =/= r2.
What to do to have:
a) potential energy = 0 and electric charge =/= 0
b) potential energy =/= 0 and electric charge =0.

In eighter one of the spheres.

Relevant equations
Gauss law.

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
If I charge the outside sphere, I will have potential energy = 0 on it and electric charge =/= 0.

b)
I tought If I charge the one inside with Q, I will have a potential =/= 0 on the bigger sphere and 0 charge.

Is this correct? The problem does not give correct answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do any of the spheres have an initial charge on them? And are you at a point in between the two spheres?
 
I'm outside and I can charge eighter the bigger or the smaller or both of them. I have to have the specs from eighter a) or b) on 1 of them.
 
Well, when you have a net positive or negative charge the potential will approach zero only at infinity (unless otherwise specified such as the ground on a circuit). If you charge the outside sphere, why would potential energy be zero on it? May you show us what equation you are using for electric potential energy?
 
Last edited:
Xsnac said:
Homework Statement

I two concentric metallic spheres r1 =/= r2.
What to do to have:
a) potential energy = 0 and electric charge =/= 0
b) potential energy =/= 0 and electric charge =0.

In either one of the spheres.

Relevant equations
Gauss law.

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
If I charge the outside sphere, I will have potential energy = 0 on it and electric charge =/= 0.

b)
I thought If I charge the one inside with Q, I will have a potential =/= 0 on the bigger sphere and 0 charge.

Is this correct? The problem does not give correct answer.
Electric potential

or

Potential energy stored in the system?
 
SammyS said:
Electric potential

or

Potential energy stored in the system?
Electric potential
 
Xsnac said:
Electric potential
That makes more sense. Electric potential is different from electrical potential energy.
So, what equation do you have for finding the electric potential at a given distance from a uniformly charged sphere?
 
haruspex said:
That makes more sense. Electric potential is different from electrical potential energy.
So, what equation do you have for finding the electric potential at a given distance from a uniformly charged sphere?
k * q1 / r ( where K is 1/4 pi epsilon )
 
Xsnac said:
k * q1 / r ( where K is 1/4 pi epsilon )
What does "r" represent ?
 
  • #10
SammyS said:
What does "r" represent ?
the distance from where the electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential.
 
  • #11
Xsnac said:
the distance from where the electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential.
No. Check your course notes.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
No. Check your course notes.
that's what I have written in the manual. Electric potential V = Q/(4*pi*epsilon) * 1/r. Should I upload a picture of the manual?
 
  • #13
Xsnac said:
that's what I have written in the manual. Electric potential V = Q/(4*pi*epsilon) * 1/r. Should I upload a picture of the manual?
I'm not querying your equation. It's your definition of r that is wrong.
 
  • #14
then I'm lost. what's the definition? I always tought it is the distance between the place where electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential..
 
  • #15
Xsnac said:
then I'm lost. what's the definition? I always tought it is the distance between the place where electric potential is 0 to where you want to measure the electric potential..
The equation you quoted can be applied in two contexts.
In the most basic one it gives the potential at distance r caused by a point charge Q, if taking the potential at infinity to be zero.
It also works if the charge is spread uniformly over a spherical shell or through a solid sphere. In these cases, r is the distance from the centre of the sphere, and the equation only works if r is greater than the radius of the sphere.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
920
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K