Early galaxies in formative stages: where are they now?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhanthomJay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxies
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the current state of an early galaxy, referred to as Galaxy A, which was observed as it existed 10 billion years ago. Participants explore the implications of cosmic expansion and the limitations of our knowledge regarding the present state of distant galaxies, as well as the paradox of knowing the composition of the universe while being uncertain about its current state.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that due to the vast distance, we can never truly "know" the current state of Galaxy A, as its light has taken 10 billion years to reach us.
  • Another participant suggests that it is likely Galaxy A has evolved into a more developed galaxy, remaining in a similar direction as observed in the past.
  • A different viewpoint posits that galaxies observed 10 billion years ago should resemble nearby galaxies today, implying a degree of uniformity in cosmic evolution.
  • Concerns are raised about the paradox of having precise knowledge about the universe's composition (matter, dark matter, dark energy) while lacking information about its current state.
  • One participant challenges the notion of a paradox, arguing that we possess a significant amount of knowledge about the universe's current state, countering the claim that we know "nearly nothing."
  • Another participant acknowledges the uncertainty of current events in the universe, emphasizing that new astronomical events are surprises to us, despite our extensive knowledge of stellar life cycles and cosmic composition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the extent of our knowledge regarding the universe's current state. While some argue that we know very little, others contend that we have a considerable understanding, leading to an unresolved debate on this topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in our understanding of cosmic events and the assumptions made about the stability of celestial bodies over time, without resolving the implications of these uncertainties.

PhanthomJay
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
7,201
Reaction score
527
OK , so Hubbell took a picture of an early infant galaxy as it existed 10 billion years ago or so with its light just now reaching its cameras. . We've all seen the pics. Let's call it Galaxy A. I'd like to know, where is that galaxy A now as it presently exists , 10 billion years later in the year 2012? Is it possibleto know or even predict anything about it in its present state of existence?
 
Space news on Phys.org
PhanthomJay said:
OK , so Hubbell took a picture of an early infant galaxy as it existed 10 billion years ago or so with its light just now reaching its cameras. . We've all seen the pics. Let's call it Galaxy A. I'd like to know, where is that galaxy A now as it presently exists , 10 billion years later in the year 2012? Is it possibleto know or even predict anything about it in its present state of existence?

"Know". No. It is casually disconnected from us by 10 billion years, so in terms of "know", we'll always be 10 billion years late in knowing what's going on with it and of course at some point it will pass out of our observable universe due to the expansion so even that link won't last forever.

It is LIKELY that it is now a grown-up galaxy in pretty much the same direction in which we now see it as an infant in our present and its past, just MUCH farther away.
 
PhanthomJay said:
OK , so Hubbell took a picture of an early infant galaxy as it existed 10 billion years ago or so with its light just now reaching its cameras. . We've all seen the pics. Let's call it Galaxy A. I'd like to know, where is that galaxy A now as it presently exists , 10 billion years later in the year 2012? Is it possibleto know or even predict anything about it in its present state of existence?

One of the principles of cosmology is that at a given time, things look more or less the same in all parts of the universe.

So a random galaxy that you see 10 billion years ago, should today look more or less like the nearby galaxies we see today. Conversely, looking at galaxies that are 10 billion years old gives you an idea of how our galaxy looked 10 billion years ago.
 
OK, thanks to both of you for the responses. I sort of anticipated this. But what's bothering me is that on the one hand, we seem to know everything about how much matter, dark, matter , and dark energy exist in the universe, in pretty exact pecentages, mind you, and yet on the other hand, we know nearly nothing about the universe as it presently exists. How do you explain this paradox?
 
PhanthomJay said:
OK, thanks to both of you for the responses. I sort of anticipated this. But what's bothering me is that on the one hand, we seem to know everything about how much matter, dark, matter , and dark energy exist in the universe, in pretty exact pecentages, mind you, and yet on the other hand, we know nearly nothing about the universe as it presently exists. How do you explain this paradox?

I don't understand why you see any paradox because I don't agree that we we know nearly nothing about the universe as it presently exists. I'd say we know quite a remarkable amount. It may not seem like much when looked back on in a thousand years, but still "nearly nothing" ? --- I just don't get that at all.
 
phinds said:
I don't understand why you see any paradox because I don't agree that we we know nearly nothing about the universe as it presently exists. I'd say we know quite a remarkable amount. It may not seem like much when looked back on in a thousand years, but still "nearly nothing" ? --- I just don't get that at all.
Well, that's what you told me, no? That we know nothing about the early galaxies in their present state, or about anything whose light has not yet reached us...heck, maybe the sun has disintegrated but we won't know that until 8 minutes from now...an unlikely occurrence for sure but do you catch my drift??
 
PhanthomJay said:
Well, that's what you told me, no? That we know nothing about the early galaxies in their present state, or about anything whose light has not yet reached us...heck, maybe the sun has disintegrated but we won't know that until 8 minutes from now...an unlikely occurrence for sure but do you catch my drift??

Ah ... gotcha now. Yes, you're right. We are ASSUMING, without basis in fact but a reasonable assumption nonetheless, that the sun hasn't disintegrated and such.

Every "new" event, a supernova say, is a surprize to us even though most of them happened before there were any humans around.

STILL ... we know all kinds of things about what kinds of stars there are and what their life-spans look like, and just TONS of other things about how the cosmos is made up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Featured
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K