The impossible early galaxy formation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paper "The Impossibly Early Galaxy Problem" by Charles L. Steinhardt et al., which addresses the discrepancy between observed high-redshift galaxies and predictions from the hierarchical merging paradigm and $\Lambda$CDM model. The authors highlight that surveys like CFHTLS, CANDELS, and SPLASH reveal a significant overabundance of massive halos at redshifts $z \sim 6-8$, suggesting these galaxies formed earlier than theoretically expected. They propose three explanations focused on improving models of star and galaxy formation to reconcile observations with existing theories, emphasizing that the age of the universe is not the core issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hierarchical merging paradigm in cosmology
  • Familiarity with $\Lambda$CDM model
  • Knowledge of high-redshift galaxy surveys (CFHTLS, CANDELS, SPLASH)
  • Basic concepts of stellar synthesis models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced modeling techniques in galaxy formation
  • Study the implications of high-redshift galaxy surveys on cosmological theories
  • Explore the role of cold dark matter in structure formation
  • Investigate alternative theories to $\Lambda$CDM regarding galaxy evolution
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers focused on galaxy formation and evolution, particularly those interested in reconciling observational data with theoretical models in cosmology.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
Is there general consensus that the universe is to young?
arXiv:1506.01377 [pdf, ps, other]
The Impossibly Early Galaxy Problem
Charles L. Steinhardt, Peter Capak, Dan Masters, Josh S. Speagle
Comments: 7 pages, submitted
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)

The current hierarchical merging paradigm and $\Lambda$CDM predict that the $z \sim 4-8$ universe should be a time in which the most massive galaxies are transitioning from their initial halo assembly to the later baryonic evolution seen in star-forming galaxies and quasars. However, no evidence of this transition has been found in many high redshift galaxy surveys including CFHTLS, CANDELS and SPLASH, the first studies to probe the high-mass end at these redshifts. Indeed, if halo mass to stellar mass ratios estimated at lower-redshift continue to $z \sim 6-8$, CANDELS and SPLASH report several orders of magnitude more $M \sim 10^{12-13} M_\odot$ halos than are possible to have formed by those redshifts, implying these massive galaxies formed impossibly early. We consider various systematics in the stellar synthesis models used to estimate physical parameters and possible galaxy formation scenarios in an effort to reconcile observation with theory. Although known uncertainties can greatly reduce the disparity between recent observations and cold dark matter merger simulations, even taking the most conservative view of the observations, there remains considerable tension with current theory.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
wolram said:
Is there general consensus that the universe is too young?
arXiv:1506.01377 [pdf, ps, other]
The Impossibly Early Galaxy Problem
Charles L. Steinhardt, Peter Capak, Dan Masters, Josh S. Speagle
...
I don't think the age of the universe is at issue here, Wooly.
It is about astronomer's models of star formation, and galaxy formation. The authors, at the end with their conclusions, propose 3 possible explanations for what they see and they all have to do with modeling how structure formation works better--so that it can happen somewhat earlier.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: |Glitch|

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Featured
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K