Easy Question About the Number Operator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter metapuff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the number operator in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of fermionic systems. When operating on the ground state ##\Psi_0## with the number operator ##c_k^{\dagger} c_k##, the result is the Fermi distribution, represented as ##\langle \Psi_0 | c_k^{\dagger} c_k | \Psi_0 \rangle = \frac{1}{e^{(\epsilon_k - \mu)\beta} + 1}##. However, when applying the operator ##c^{\dagger}_k c_l## for ##k \neq l##, the expectation value is zero due to the anticommutation relation, as shown by the factorization leading to ##(c^\dagger_k)^2=0##. Additionally, for the ground state of spin-down electrons ##\Psi_{0,\downarrow}##, the expectation value with spin-up operators also yields zero, reinforcing the importance of understanding operator behavior in second quantization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fermionic systems and ground states in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with the number operator and its application in second quantization.
  • Knowledge of anticommutation relations for fermionic operators.
  • Basic concepts of Fermi-Dirac statistics and the Fermi distribution.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of fermionic operators and their anticommutation relations.
  • Learn about second quantization techniques and their applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore Fermi-Dirac statistics in greater detail, focusing on implications for particle systems.
  • Investigate the role of spin in quantum systems, particularly in relation to fermionic particles.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers working with fermionic systems or second quantization techniques will benefit from this discussion.

metapuff
Messages
53
Reaction score
6
Suppose I have a system of fermions in the ground state ##\Psi_0##. If I operate on this state with the number operator, I get
\langle \Psi_0 | c_k^{\dagger} c_k | \Psi_0 \rangle = \frac{1}{e^{(\epsilon_k - \mu)\beta} + 1}
which is, of course, the fermi distribution. What if I operate with ##c^{\dagger}_k c_l##, where ##k \neq l##? I.e, what is
\langle \Psi_0 | c_k^{\dagger} c_l | \Psi_0 \rangle?
My hunch says that this is zero, but I'm not sure. This might be obvious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can show that this is zero by writing out the ground state ##|\Psi_0\rangle## as a product of creation operators acting on the vacuum ##|0>##. Since ##\{c^\dagger_k,c_l\}=0## for ##k\neq l##, we can anticommute the ##c^\dagger_k## through to the ##c^\dagger_k## appearing in the product. Then we find a factor of ##(c^\dagger_k)^2=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: metapuff
Nice! That's really clever. This seems like a trick that I'll be using a lot. :)
 
Okay, another question. Let ##\Psi_{0,\downarrow}## be the ground state for spin down electrons (for example we could have a partially polarized electron gas, with ##\Psi_{0,\downarrow}## representing the filled fermi sphere for down-spin electrons). If I try to act on this with the number operator for spin up particles, like
\langle \Psi_{0,\downarrow} | c^{\dagger}_{\uparrow} c_{\uparrow} | \Psi_{0,\downarrow} \rangle
do I get 0 (since there are no spin-up particles in the down-spin ground state), or can I just pull the spin-up operators out, and write
\langle \Psi_{0,\downarrow} | c^{\dagger}_{\uparrow} c_{\uparrow} | \Psi_{0,\downarrow} \rangle = c^{\dagger}_{\uparrow} c_{\uparrow}?
Again, this might be obvious, but I don't have a lot of confidence with second quantization yet and am trying to build intuition. Thanks!
 
You will get zero because you can anticommute to get the expression

$$ c^\dagger_{k\uparrow} \prod_r^\mathcal{N} c^\dagger_{r\downarrow} c_{k\uparrow} | 0 \rangle.$$

Also, you generally can't pull operators out of an expectation value. If the expectation value you're writing down is physically sensible then the operator acts on the state that you're using to compute the expectation value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K