Effect of Lowered Center of Gravity on Jumping Time

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of a lowered center of gravity on the time spent in the air during a jump. Participants are exploring the implications of this change in the context of physics, particularly in relation to motion and gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relationship between the center of gravity and jump dynamics, questioning whether a lower center of gravity increases time spent in the air. There are discussions about treating the athlete as a point particle and considering the implications of changing the height of the center of gravity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing assumptions and clarifying concepts. Some have provided insights into the mechanics of jumping and the role of center of mass, while others are still grappling with the implications of these changes on jump height and time.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the scenario where the center of gravity is lowered by 50 cm and are questioning the assumptions made in previous parts of the problem. There is an emphasis on understanding the physical model being used to analyze the jump.

ravsterphysics
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


1.JPG
2.JPG
3.JPG


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


For part a) I got t=0.571 seconds
For part b) I got s=4.6m

But part c) is what I'm stuck on. If his centre of gravity has shifted lower by 50cm, is his time spent in the air greater?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good assumption! so let him take off as a block of 2 m high and shrink to a block of 1 m high (with the same mass)
 
ravsterphysics said:
But part c) is what I'm stuck on. If his centre of gravity has shifted lower by 50cm, is his time spent in the air greater
In solving parts a and b, you treated the athlete as a point particle. What point would it make sense to use?
 
BvU said:
Good assumption! so let him take off as a block of 2 m high and shrink to a block of 1 m high (with the same mass)

haruspex said:
In solving parts a and b, you treated the athlete as a point particle. What point would it make sense to use?

i guess what I don't undestand is why his time spent in the air increases when he lands with lower center of gravity??

and working with that assumption, does that mean his max vertical distance has increased by 50cm?
 
ravsterphysics said:
does that mean his max vertical distance has increased by 50cm?
Yes.
 
See the picture. He jumps with his foot reaching the ground. The red spot shows the centre of mass, it is about 1 m high above the ground.
During the jump, he lifts his legs, and he lands with his bottom reaching the ground. The final position of the centre of mass is 50 cm deeper than the initial height.

upload_2016-12-26_6-7-48.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cutter Ketch

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K