Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Efficiency, Loss...is there a more specific term?

  1. Apr 3, 2017 #1
    Suppose I heat a room directly by lighting a fire in the room, let's say it is a butane gas fire and it takes n BTU to raise the temperature by 10°C.

    Now, suppose I don't like the smell of burning gas fumes and decide instead to move the same gas fire outside and boil water to generate steam to run a generator to produce electricity to power an electric heater in the same room and it takes 3n BTU to raise the temperature by 10°C.

    Is there a technical term to descibe the 3 x BTU difference between direct heat and indirect heat in the above?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 3, 2017 #2

    anorlunda

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    :welcome:

    The word in your title; efficiency. I'm not sure what other word you are searching for.
     
  4. Apr 3, 2017 #3

    CWatters

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I think it would be best to call it something like the "relative efficiency" because the original butane fire isn't going to be 100% efficient.
     
  5. Apr 3, 2017 #4

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I don't see a problem with using "efficiency" as long as you describe clearly what you are talking about. As said, it isn't necessarily straightforward. For this situation, there is a potential difference between total and sensible energy output (lower vs higher heating value), that may still make the efficiency of the fire in the room less than 100%. And if the system is properly vented so as not to violate code/kill anyone, the ventilation should be factored into the efficiency as well.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Efficiency, Loss...is there a more specific term?
  1. Loss Coefficients (Replies: 1)

Loading...