How does evaporation generate cooling? Swamp coolers edition

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dario2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooling Evaporation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanisms of evaporative cooling, particularly in the context of swamp coolers, and the thermodynamic principles involved in the phase change of water from liquid to vapor. Participants explore the energy dynamics during evaporation and condensation, as well as the implications for temperature changes in various scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that evaporation generates cooling because the average temperature of the remaining water decreases as higher-energy molecules escape into vapor.
  • Others argue that the energy required for evaporation, known as the heat of vaporization, is significantly greater than that needed to raise the temperature of water to its boiling point, leading to a cooling effect.
  • A participant questions the relationship between the temperature of evaporating water and the cooling effect, suggesting that if water is at 100°C, the cooling effect may be negligible.
  • There is a discussion about the role of kinetic energy in evaporation and how it relates to temperature, with some participants noting that only the fastest-moving molecules escape, thus lowering the average kinetic energy of the remaining water.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of condensation, with one participant suggesting that condensation releases heat, potentially warming the surrounding environment.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the energy dynamics during evaporation and condensation, asking where the energy goes after breaking molecular bonds and how it eventually converts back to heat.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the cooling effects of evaporation and the energy dynamics involved, with no consensus reached on the precise mechanisms or implications of these processes.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific assumptions about temperature and energy transfer, and participants have not fully resolved the mathematical relationships between temperature changes and energy requirements during phase transitions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals studying thermodynamics, those exploring the principles of evaporative cooling, and anyone considering the practical applications of swamp coolers in different climates.

  • #31
dario2 said:
Yes, but if the cold coil was outside, you could have a situation where it's losing more heat to the environment than it's pulling in....
No, that doesn't even make any sense/it's a self contradiction. It's called "the cold coil" because it is colder than the environment it is in and colder than the warm coil.
Something else I'm thinking of now, is some of the condensation on the cold coil coming from vapor in the outdoor air, or is it all from vapor in the indoor air that's being recirculated?
The cold coil is outside. All of the air flowing over it is outside air so all of the condensation is from outside air. There's no way for inside air to get to it.

It may help if you draw or look at a diagram of the process. It should be immediately obvious why what you are saying makes no sense.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
dario2 said:
But this doesn't account for the extra 540C heat of vaporization that was mentioned here, it only accounts for the difference between 100C in the vapor molecules leaving and the liquid water temperature, divided by how many molecules are still left in liquid form.
You are right, of course. My description misses out a significant factor. The 'energy' that air, passing over the surface, removes will consist of the KE plus the PE of each molecule.* However, I think I'm correct in saying that only the fraction of water molecules with initially high KE will be taken far enough from the surface to be removed 'into the air'. It's the loss of the KE , shared with the air, that increases the temperature of the air but, losing the PE, will require more energy to be supplied to the surface than is delivered into the air. I liked the old term "sensible heat" which is heat that's associated with the temperature rise of the steam from a boiler after it's boiled with latent heat.

I've been thinking about Orbital Physics more than Thermal Physics, lately but there's a parallel with the energy used by a rocket to 1. Escape from a planet's gravitational PE and 2. the KE left for interplanetary travel. The bonds at a water surface corresponds to the g from a massive planet where the bonds on the surface of, say Methanol, correspond to the g from a small planetoid.
 
  • #33
Evaporative coolers (i.e., "Swamp Coolers") work by having water put onto a surface and then blowing air over it so that it evaporates; the equilibrium temperature of this action is the Adiabatic Saturation Temperature or "Wet Bulb" temperature. In a high humidity environment, the wet-bulb T is close to the regular (or "Dry Bulb") temperature, so this doesn't do much, but in a low-humidity environment, the wet-bulb temperature is much lower, so it works fine, also adding in some humidity so that the controlled environment is not so dry. The difference between the dry- & wet- bulb temperatures is basically due to the heat of evaporation of water vapor - such that energy that goes into the evaporation is taken from the water on a wet surface.

The biological action of sweating basically uses this idea, as sweated skin has the equilibrium temperature as the wet-bulb (ironically, sweating in a dry environment doesn't leave any sweat as it evaporates away, while sweating in a humid environment leaves sweat drops).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
15K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K