Efficient Venturi Tube Calibration for Digital Peak Flowmeters | Thesis Design

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the calibration of a venturi tube designed for a digital peak flowmeter, specifically addressing the challenge of calibrating flowrate without a measured flowrate producing device. Participants explore the discrepancies between theoretical and experimental flow rates, as well as the implications of using different fluids for calibration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes a current error of 12.3% between theoretical (610 L/min) and experimental (535 L/min) flow rates.
  • Another participant questions whether the nature of the fluid (air vs. liquid) impacts the calibration process.
  • A participant inquires about the method used to calculate the current error rate.
  • There is mention of comparing the new digital peak flowmeter's readings with those from another device, raising questions about the accuracy of each measurement.
  • References to external sources are made, including a study comparing various portable peak flow meters and their percent errors.
  • A participant asks how to calibrate their results based on the information discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the calibration process and the accuracy of different measurement devices. Multiple competing views on the impact of fluid type and calibration methods remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the specific calibration methods available and the dependence on the accuracy of the comparison device used for measuring flow rates.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers working on fluid dynamics, calibration techniques, or those involved in the design of medical devices related to respiratory health.

CadisEtramaDiRaizel
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I've designed a venturi tube for my thesis ( Design of a digital peak flowmeter). I was wondering if there was a way to calibrate the flowrate, without using a measured flowrate producing device. The current error is about 12.3%. Theoretical 610L/min vs experimental 535L/min.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Bucket
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
CadisEtramaDiRaizel said:
Theoretical 610L/min vs experimental 535L/min.

Big bucket.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nidum
CWatters said:
Big bucket.
But it's airflow, wouldn't the nature of the fluid ( being water or any other liquid) impact calibration?
 
CadisEtramaDiRaizel said:
I've designed a venturi tube for my thesis ( Design of a digital peak flowmeter). I was wondering if there was a way to calibrate the flowrate, without using a measured flowrate producing device. The current error is about 12.3%. Theoretical 610L/min vs experimental 535L/min.
Forgot to add, that it's used to check asthma parameters
 
What did you use to calculate the current error rate?
 
So you compared the flow rate recorded by your new digital peak flowmeter with the flow rate measured by another device and recorded on a chart?

How do you know which is more accurate?

Google found..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882540/

"Comparison of five portable peak flow meters"

From the Results..

"The percent error for the spirometric values for each meter was 5.1% for Air Zone®, 1.9% for Assess®, 11.2% for Galemed®, 6.5% for Personal Best® and 3.0% for Vitalograph®."
 
CWatters said:
So you compared the flow rate recorded by your new digital peak flowmeter with the flow rate measured by another device and recorded on a chart?

How do you know which is more accurate?

Google found..

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882540/

"Comparison of five portable peak flow meters"

From the Results..

"The percent error for the spirometric values for each meter was 5.1% for Air Zone®, 1.9% for Assess®, 11.2% for Galemed®, 6.5% for Personal Best® and 3.0% for Vitalograph®."
Then how do I calibrate my results? Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
453
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K