Ehrenfest Theorem: Significance & Relation to Space-Time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Ehrenfest Theorem establishes a crucial link between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics by demonstrating that the time evolution of the expectation value of an observable corresponds to classical equations under certain conditions. Specifically, the theorem is articulated through the equation \(\frac{d}{dt}\langle A\rangle = \frac{1}{i\hbar}\langle [A,H] \rangle + \left\langle \frac{\partial A}{\partial t}\right\rangle\), which shows how quantum observables behave over time. This theorem allows for the evaluation of quantum observables that have classical counterparts, reinforcing the consistency of quantum mechanics with classical physics. It also raises the question of whether classical mechanics can be entirely derived from quantum mechanics, particularly through the path-integral formalism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly operators and observables.
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics, especially Newton's laws.
  • Knowledge of Heisenberg's equation of motion.
  • Basic grasp of the path-integral formalism in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Ehrenfest Theorem in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the path-integral formalism and its relationship to classical mechanics.
  • Research the correspondence principle and its applications in physics.
  • Examine the role of expectation values in quantum mechanics and their classical analogs.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational connections between quantum and classical physics will benefit from this discussion.

kehler
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Is there any physical significance of this theorem? Can we make some kind of conclusion about space and time because the derivative of the expectation value of momentum with respect to time is equal to the negative of the expectation value of the derivative of potential energy w.r.t. space (d<p>/dt = -<dV/dx>)?? Or does it just prove to us that quantum mech and classical mech have some common ground?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But quantum mech has common ground with classical mech by construction, so what is there to prove?
 
I don't know. I was just wondering what the theorem does...
 
the theorem says:

\frac{d}{dt}\langle A\rangle = \frac{1}{i\hbar}\langle [A,H] \rangle + \left\langle \frac{\partial A}{\partial t}\right\rangle

for any operator A.
 
The equation simply shows how the expectation value of an observable evolves with time. If you know of Heisenberg's equation of motion, the Ehrenfest theorem is simply the expectation value of the operator (observable) in question. The theorem itself is significant in the fact that you should be able to evaluate for observables and receive a classical equation, if the observable happens to have a classical correspondence. This theorem is a way to check that quantum mechanics is still consistent with classical mechanics in certain limits, because we do not want to lose Newton's law on the macroscopic scale now do we.

Basically, if some observable in quantum mechanics can also be measured classically, like momentum, you should get a familiar classical equation when making appropriate operator substitutions in the Ehrenfest theorem.
 
^ Thanks :). That makes it clear
 
one can say that one would like to derive classical mechanics from quantum mechanics.
 
Is it possible though to derive the whole of classical mechanics from quantum mechanics?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K