Eigenfunctions of Operators with Continuous Sprectra

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The eigenfunctions of operators with continuous spectra, such as position and momentum operators, are not normalizable due to their inherent mathematical properties. Specifically, the position eigenstates exhibit orthogonality through the Dirac delta function, which cannot be normalized in the traditional sense. Similarly, momentum eigenfunctions, represented by the function g(x) = A exp(ipx), yield an infinite norm, confirming their non-normalizability. Consequently, these eigenfunctions are classified as generalized eigenfunctions rather than members of the semi-inner product space of square-integrable functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, particularly eigenstates and operators.
  • Familiarity with Dirac delta functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of semi-inner product spaces and square-integrable functions.
  • Basic grasp of integrals and their implications in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Dirac delta functions in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the implications of generalized eigenfunctions in quantum theory.
  • Explore the mathematical framework of semi-inner product spaces.
  • Learn about the role of continuous spectra in quantum operators.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists exploring operator theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum states and their properties.

Sferics
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm self-studying Griffith's Intro to Quantum Mechanics, and on page 100 he makes the claim that the eigenfunctions of operators with continuous spectra are not normalizable. I can't see why this is necessarily true. Hopefully I am not missing something basic.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem comes when you try and work out the meaning of "orthogonality". Say x and y are position eigenstates. Then we want
\langle x | y\rangle =\delta(x-y)
For discrete quantities, the Kronecker delta is either one or zero. The Dirac delta function used here has to be something more like an infinite weight, in the handwaving way we tend to talk about these things. As it's neither a function, nor a number, there's no sense in which we can just divide by \delta(0) to make the "norm" of such a state one.

Hope that helps.
 
Momentum eigenfunctions have a similar problem. Consider the function g defined by g(x)=A exp(ipx) for all x. This is a momentum "eigenfunction". If we plug it into the usual formula for the norm of a wavefunction, we get
$$\|g\|^2=\int(Ae^{ipx})^*(Ae^{ipx})dx=|A|^2\int dx.$$ There's clearly no choice of A that makes the right-hand side =1, since ##\int dx=\infty##.

Note that the space of wavefunctions is the semi-inner product space of square-integrable ##\mathbb C##-valued functions on ##\mathbb R##. What I did above shows that a momentum "eigenfunction" isn't square-integrable. This means that it's not actually a member of that semi-inner product space. So it's actually more appropriate to say that the momentum operator doesn't have any eigenfunctions. These functions are a kind of generalized eigenfunctions.
 
I understand that these two examples (which he provides) are not normalizable, but it almost seems as if it just happened that way. How do we know that, for any arbitrary operator with a continuous spectra, it's eigenfunctions are not normalizable?
 
For any continuous spectra, your "sum" over eigenstates will have to be an integral. This necessarily implies that the states will have a delta function norm.
If this isn't clear, think about some totally arbitrary continuum of values f, and think about how the identity operator acts on one specific eigenstate with eigenvalue f_0:
|f_0\rangle=\int df \langle f|f_0\rangle |f\rangle
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K