1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Eigenfunctions problem - i have the answer, explanation required!

  1. Jan 10, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    [​IMG]


    Now in a revision lecture given a few weeks ago, the lecturer gave this as the answer.



    3. The attempt at a solution
    [​IMG]

    No I think generally I'm fine with it (apart from it doesn't seem very obvious that this is what you should do with the maths!).

    BUT
    1) Where do the subscript m's come from? Why aren't they still n's like are used for the conjugate of [tex]\psi[/tex]?

    2) How come the delta function suddendly gets rid of the sigma m, and itself, whilst simultaneously changing the am to an?

    And whats a good definition of orthogonality? A simple laymans definition!!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 10, 2007 #2

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    There are two different eigenvalues, An and Am. You are multiplying two sums and combining them into one. For example [itex](a_1+ a_2+ a_3)(b_1+ b_2+ b_3)= a_1b_1+ a_1b_2+ a_1b_3+ a_2b_1+ a_2b_2+ a_2b_3+ a_3b_1+ a_3b_2+ a_3b_3[/itex] where I have used "b" for the second sum for clarity. Notice that multiplying two sums of 3 terms each gives a 9 term sum as product. In general, multiply two sums of N terms gives a sum of N2 terms.

    If [itex]a_na_m= \delta_{mn}[/itex] which is defined as: 1 if m= n, 0 otherwise, then the above sum becomes 1+ 0+ 0+ 0+ 1+ 0+ 0+ 0+ 1 and the 9 terms reduce to three: 1+ 1+ 1 (of course, each "1" is multiplied by some term).

    Basic definition is that two vectors are orthogonal if and only if they are perpendicular. Of course, if your "vectors" are abstract functions then you have to think about what you mean by "orthogonal". We say that two vectors are orthogonal if and only if some inner product is 0. For functions this is [itex]\int f(x)g(x)dx[/itex] with the integral taken over some interval.

    A set of vectors is "orthonormal" if each has length 1 (the "normal" part) and any two different vectors are perpendicular (the "ortho" part). That is the same as saying that the inner product of a vector in the set with itself is 1 and with any other vector in the set is 0: the delta.
     
  4. Jan 10, 2007 #3
    So:

    Am is written as such just because its used for [tex]\psi[/tex] rather than [tex]\psi*[/tex] just as a way to differentiate between the two sets of eigenvalues that arise from using the conjugate?

    If that is the case, why couldn't an* and an be used from the very start?

    And the delta function disappears because it is set to 1, and therefore an = am so one can be written as the other? And as a result there is no need for the sigma over n?

    Thanks for your help.
     
  5. Jan 19, 2007 #4
    The reason for using the m's and n's is really to make the derivation more general. If, for instance, you have two different eigenfunctions so that you have [tex]\psi_{m}[/tex] and [tex]\psi_{n}[/tex], then taking their inner product would give you:

    [tex]\int \psi^{*}_{m} \psi_{n} dx[/tex]

    Now, because the set of all the [tex]\psi[/tex]s are orthonormal, this inner product is 0 unless m=n. That is what orthonormality really means (that and the functions are normalized; i.e. integrating them over all space gives you 1).

    When you get to the summation over n and m, all you are doing is subsituting in for what [tex]\psi^{*}_{m}[/tex] and [tex]\psi_{n}[/tex] are defined to be. The n and m are just two indices that you sum over. The idea here is that you sum them independent of each other, not all at once. This is why there are two. Then you use the condition that the u's are also orthonormal, pull out the summations, and use the Kronecker Delta. Essentially, the Kronecker Delta kills all the terms in the summation over m except for one, when m=n. So you just drop the summation over m and change all the m subscripts to n's.
     
    Last edited: Jan 19, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Eigenfunctions problem - i have the answer, explanation required!
  1. Eigenfunction problem (Replies: 2)

Loading...