Eigenstate of two observable operators

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the properties of two non-commuting Hermitian operators, A and B, particularly in relation to their eigenstates and the implications for simultaneous measurements. Participants explore the conditions under which these operators can share eigenstates and the effects of mixed states on measurement probabilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether having a shared eigenstate between two non-commuting operators implies that the observables can be measured simultaneously when acting on that eigenstate.
  • Another participant notes that non-commuting operators can have a common eigenstate "by accident," using the example of the hydrogen atom's s orbital states where all components of angular momentum are zero.
  • A follow-up inquiry asks if measuring the eigenvalues of non-commuting operators is possible when they act on a shared eigenstate.
  • Participants discuss the implications of measuring the components of orbital angular momentum in the hydrogen atom's ground state, suggesting that repeated measurements yield consistent results without changing the state.
  • There is a question about whether the zero eigenvalue represents a special case or if any eigenvalue could apply in similar circumstances.
  • Another participant proposes a scenario involving mixed states, suggesting that the probability of simultaneous measurement could be derived from the probabilities of finding corresponding eigenvalues for each operator.
  • A mathematical example is provided involving block diagonal matrices to illustrate the existence of a common eigenstate where both eigenvalues are equal to one.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects multiple competing views regarding the implications of shared eigenstates for simultaneous measurements of non-commuting operators. There is no consensus on whether mixed states can lead to probabilities of simultaneous measurements or how to interpret the results of such measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of non-commuting operators and the conditions under which measurements can be considered simultaneous. The discussion includes assumptions about idealized situations and the nature of eigenvalues.

Kavorka
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Let's say you have two operators A and B such that when they act on an eigenstate they yield a measurement of an observable quantity (so they're Hermitian). A and B do not commute, so they can't be measured simultaneously. My question is this: You have a matrix representation of A and B and you find their eigenvalues and corresponding eigenstates (eigenvectors), let's say they each have a basis of 3 eigenstates. My understanding is that if their eigenstate basis is not identical, they are not simultaneously measurable quantities and thus do not commute. What if A and B, which don't commute share a 1 eigenstate in common out of their 3 states? Does that mean that the two observables are simultaneously measurable when acting on that eigenstate? What if you had a mixed state, not a singular state, would there then be a probability of the observables being simultaneously measurable and a probability that they won't be? This wouldn't make sense to me in terms of non-commuting operators, but I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sometimes non-commuting operators can have a common eigenstate "by accident", for example in the radial-symmetric s orbital states of a hydrogen atom all the components of orbital angular momentum are zero at the same time, while usually you can't measure the angular momentum components simultaneously.
 
hilbert2 said:
Sometimes non-commuting operators can have a common eigenstate "by accident", for example in the radial-symmetric s orbital states of a hydrogen atom all the components of orbital angular momentum are zero at the same time, while usually you can't measure the angular momentum components simultaneously.
So you would be able to measure the eigenvalues of the non-commuting operators simultaneously if they acted on the eigenstate they share?
 
Yes, you can measure all the components of orbital angular momentum of a hydrogen atom ground state as many times as you want and you always get the result zero and the state of the atom doesn't change in any way (at least in an idealized situation).
 
hilbert2 said:
Yes, you can measure all the components of orbital angular momentum of a hydrogen atom ground state as many times as you want and you always get the result zero and the state of the atom doesn't change in any way (at least in an idealized situation).
Does it being 0 make it a special case, or it can be any eigenvalue?

Also, if you had a mixed state, would that mean the probability of simultaneous measurement would be the product of the probabilities of finding the corresponding eigenvalue for each operator? Like if A had a 50% chance of yielding the eigenvalue of the eigenstate it shares with B, and B had a 30% chance of yielding that eigenvalue, then there would be a chance of simultaneous measurement of 15%? In effect, non-commuting operators means that they are not ALWAYS simultaneously measurable, but they could be sometimes? How can that be true if the commutator is ALWAYS non-zero?
 
You can also play with block diagonal matrices like
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 \\[0.3em]
0 & A \\[0.3em]
\end{bmatrix}

and

\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 \\[0.3em]
0 & B \\[0.3em]
\end{bmatrix}

where A and B are non-commuting hermitian matrices, and you'll see that they have at least one common eigenstate where both eigenvalues are 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K